cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/34272214

A California-based biotechnology startup has officially launched the world’s first commercially available butter made entirely from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen, eliminating the need for traditional agriculture or animal farming. Savor, backed by Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates through his Breakthrough Energy Ventures fund, announced the commercial release of its animal- and plant-free butter after three years of development.

The revolutionary product uses a proprietary thermochemical process that transforms carbon dioxide captured from the air, hydrogen from water, and methane into fat molecules chemically identical to those found in dairy butter. According to the company, the process creates fatty acids by heating these gases under controlled temperature and pressure conditions, then combining them with glycerol to form triglycerides.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    This could be great, but “proprietary”. Gates is still the same Gates. If you want to save all the land and CO2 this could, release the IP free to all. Flood the market with cheap indistinguishable synobutter, real butter can’t compete with. Milk, cheese and yogurt next please.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m not a scientist, but isn’t EVERYTHING made of carbon?

    Source: Joni Mitchell, Woodstock -

    We are stardust, we are golden We are billion-year-old carbon

    • Gsus4@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      “Made of” can mean “composed of” or “constructed from”. This is the latter:

      Savor says they take carbon dioxide from the air and hydrogen from water, heat them up, oxidize them and get a final result that looks like candle wax but is in fact fat molecules like those in beef, cheese or vegetable oils.

      The entire process releases zero greenhouse gases, uses no farmland to feed cows, and despite its industrial appearance, has a significantly smaller footprint.

      “In addition to the carbon footprint being much lower for a process like this, right, the land footprint is, like, a thousand times lower than what you need in traditional agriculture,”

      Good example of how choice of words can mislead, particularly when intentional.

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    but does it actually taste like the real thing? because I can already buy something that, supposedly, I should be unable to believe isn’t real butter, but after doing so I remain suspicious

  • ptolemai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s a term for that high-carbon butter-like substance. Migraine or something…

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    While I think this is pretty amazing science stuff, the writing is terrible. Here is the progression of the story as written:

    They made butter from carbon…

    Well, it’s actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, and oxygen…

    OK, it’s actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, and methane…

    Well, no, it’s actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, methane, and glycerol…

    Wait, hang on, it’s actually made from carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, methane, glycerol, natural flavor, and lecithin…

    Now, the source of glycerol is in question, because they say this butter is both animal and plant-free. Glycerol can be made synthetically, but it’s WAY more expensive to do it. Also, I’m not seeing any way to create lecithin without plants. They never say what the “natural flavor” is.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      They never say what the “natural flavor” is.

      A reminder that “natural flavor” doesn’t mean healthier or even something you might want over the artificially created flavors. It just means it comes from a natural source and is not lab created.

      Castoreum, sometimes used for vanilla and raspberry flavoring, comes from beaver anal secretions. That would be labelled under a “natural flavor” and you’d never be told more than that.

      I’ll take the artificial stuff any day just on principle there.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 days ago

          Maybe he wouldn’t have lost anything, but I wouldn’t have been able to enjoy his comment.

      • Hobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I think it’s worth pointing out that vanilla extract is from vanilla beans and artificial vanilla is whatever the fuck they feel like that tastes like vanilla. Also, modern artificial vanilla extremely rarely, if ever, is derived from Castoreum because it’s hard as hell to farm beavers and expensive as all fuck. The “artificial vanilla comes from beaver anal glands” is basically a prevalent internet myth that gets passed around like the, “You eat 7 spiders a year in your sleep.” myth.

        Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/does-vanilla-flavoring-actually-come-from-beaver-butts-180983288/

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Incorrect, vanillin is the primary component of real vanilla beans and responsible for like 90% of the flavor.

          • Hobo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 days ago

            I don’t understand what this would be correcting in what I said above. Can you show me what part this is correcting? Cause I’m legitimately confused.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              You said artificial vanilla is whatever the fuck. It’s not, artificial vanilla is the main ingredient of natural vanilla, but without the other flavors

              • Hobo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Ah gotcha! I for sure was not following what you were saying. I don’t know if that’s he real thrust of the point in my above comment, but I was more referring to the fact that artificial vanilla doesn’t necessarily come from vanilla beans. I should’ve been more precise with my language, but it’s worth noting that artificial vanilla is largely synthesized and comes from a variety of sources, not just vanilla beans (see below for the source/pertinent excerpt).

                It also gets weird as to how the FDA regulates the term. I believe the key term is actually “Pure” in the “Pure Vanilla Extract” but don’t quote me on that. Not sure how it’s done by other regulatory agencies but it’s probably equally convoluted in a lot of places.

                Source: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/technical-documents/technical-article/food-and-beverage-testing-and-manufacturing/flavor-and-fragrance-formulation/vanilla-regulations

                Pertinent excerpt:

                However, many alternate routes to vanillin are well documented, including vanillin derived from spruce tree lignin, corn sugar, rice or wheat bran, clove oil, curcumin, or guaiacol.

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Yes, that’s true, but the vanillin in the artificial stuff is chemically identical to the real thing

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 days ago

        Also, poop has natural flavour. Natural flavour also doesn’t mean it tastes good.

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Myth. Vanilla extracts either come from low grade vanilla pods or cloves. It may have been but not today.

      • nurple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Fuck man I had no idea, I’ve missed out on my prime years of eating beaver anal secretions 😭

        • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          They can still be your prime years in terms of quantity of beaver ass eaten, if not in quality. But I think you sell yourself short. They’re gonna love you!

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        My ex wife’s uncle was the director of the south American division of the arm that made coloring and flavorings of one of the big Food/Chem groups, Procter & Gamble, or unilever, or one of those. Can’t remember.

        No one in his household ate any processed/ultra processed foods.

        Do the math.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Where do you think Trump is sending all the homeless? A big old wooden screw press…

        • crank0271@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I was thinking Soylent Green, but if Buffy provided a reference point for Charlton Heston, all the better.

    • Dragomus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      It kind of sounds like the beginnings of star trek’s replicators…

      But that aside, somehow I doubt those are the exact only “ingredients” they use.
      And it wouldn’t surprise me at all if the end product contains all kinds of trace elements of various not so healthy chemicals used to get the parts to combine into the actual butter.
      Like the process to get the glycerol or lecithin in a state they can use.

      Ofcourse a lot of our dietary ingredients are contaminated in various levels anyway.

      • UnpledgedCatnapTipper@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        It makes me think of Enterprise, where they don’t have replicators but they do have protein resequencers, which can take waste matter and convert it into useful things, but they can’t do energy to matter conversion yet.

  • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Thank goodness we have the assurances of a billionaire oligarch to help steer humanity in the right dietary direction.

    • teuniac_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Global warming and ecological crises make shifting diets away from animal products a pretty good idea.

      Whether it’s antibiotics resistance, deforestation, or greenhouse gas emissions, humanity is paying a very high price for animal agriculture at the current scale.

    • flightyhobler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Problems come up: “BILLIONAIRES SHOULD DO MORE!” Billionaires do more: “WE CANT TRUST BILLIONAIRES!!”

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        The conclusion ought to be that billionaires shouldn’t exist. Even if they donate most of their wealth, they will still donate in ways that aren’t necessarily solving real problems.

      • SippyCup@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Ruminants creating greenhouse gasses is a problem that can solve itself by returning to huge fucking pastures and cooperative farming.

        Instead, we’re getting synthetic food. We’re a decade removed from human grade kibble at this point.

        Here again, capitalism is the problem. A capitalist offering capitalism solutions to problems created by capitalism isn’t appealing.

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    So, like every other butter and oil, that’s why we call them hydrocarbon.

    I imagine this “butter” doesn’t contain any glycomacropeptide, α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, serum albumin and immunoglobulins

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 days ago

    To put it in simple terms, Savor says they take carbon dioxide from the air and hydrogen from water, heat them up, oxidize them and get a final result that looks like candle wax but is in fact fat molecules like those in beef, cheese or vegetable oils.

    So their process sounds like it creates synthetic lard, not butter. This can still be a good thing as the extra ingredients to make it “butter” aren’t really the hard/impactful part of butter.

  • Binturong@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good ol’ Gates, always around to make a quick buck of the bloodied backs of humanity. Never an advancement meant to aid us all he can’t swoop in to parasitize. That’s right Billy boy, I didn’t forget the COVID vaccine patents. Billionaires must be condemned to the rubbish bin of history.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I’d actually be willing to give it a try if it’s vaguely price-competitive, but their website is all glam shots of butter and people doing things with butter and not only doesn’t sell it but doesn’t tell you where you can get it.

    https://www.savor.it/

    Also, they did not do a good job of choosing that name. It looks like there’s a very-similarly-named French Canadian manufacturer of butter, Savör, which apparently isn’t too religious about using their umlaut:

    At Savor, we believe the best butter starts with the best environment. That’s why we source our grass-fed dairy butter from New Zealand, a country renowned for its pristine landscapes, sustainable farming, and exceptional dairy quality.

    I foresee a collision between those two.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Pretty sure I know the factory that this butter comes from. The Miraka plant; north of Taupō. Geothermally powered, restricts it to a relatively small region in NZ.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Maybe the manufacturer is in New Zealand and the French-Canadian people are the guys who package and sell it or something. Dunno, just did a quick skim of their site.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          I doubt it, I think the Miraka plant is produces mostly primary products not the secondary stuff.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah well… I never liked Savör products too much. They go out if their way with all their branding and claims, but you can get very tasty butter from local creameries at similar prices, without the need to ship it frozen halfway across the globe. Especially with milk sourced from the eastern townships or the Saguenay region. And Quebec (where Savör is operating) runs on 100% hydro power, which is equal or better to geothermal. So whatever Savör is gaining from the Miraka plant, is lost on the need to import basically.

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I get that, why import stuff that you produce locally…

              I try to never get imported food products that we make here… It just seems wasteful.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is interesting…

    Lab grown meat have problem where they cannot create fat. So if this works, maybe this is the solution.

    “So you’re using this gas right now to cook your food and we’re proposing that we would like to first make your food with— with that gas,” said Kathleen Alexander, co-founder and CEO of Savor.

    That doesn’t sound appetizing… Lol.

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not giving up a small pleasure like butter just so that a billionaire can buy another private jet and wipe out whatever tiny carbon footprint savings comes from giving up butter

    • bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      I too love participating in the simple pleasure of systemic animal abuse just to spite the billionaires

      • VonReposti@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 days ago

        How to spot a vegan: They’ll make sure to turn every discussion to a vegan direction with little effort.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Nice try, VEGAN, but we’re not going to be deluded into accepting an ethical and cost-efficient alternative to a popular but unsustainable food ingredient.

            You’ve filled this community with your malicious campaign of compassion towards living creatures and economic sensibility for FAR TOO LONG. Why don’t you take your EXTREMIST VIEWS on practical efficiency, carbon emissions reduction, ecological sustainability, and better treatment of sentient life and HIT THE BRICK, MATE!

            Your conscience, your logic, and your morale character might be welcome in VEGANLAND, but around here we’re built different.

            • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Lordy, this comment is so beautifully wet with sarcasm. Thank you for your creativity and the laughs! You’re awesome!

          • VonReposti@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yet the other user is being scolded for a choice instead of actually contributing to the conversation. Maybe the user was indeed vegetarian and had dietary problems making butter a good source for protein.

            Don’t judge other people’s diets. That’s just an ill-faithed attempt at winning them over to your side without having to show any concern for their life. Instead contribute to a conversation, ask and ye shall receive.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              The diet isn’t the issue here. The OP was saying they prefer animal-produced butter to this because… billionaires? Do they think billionaires don’t profit from the dairy industry?

              The comment makes no sense. This artificially-created butter would have equivalent nutritional content to biologically-created butter, and there’s a decent chance it can mimic the flavor as well. So it absolutely makes sense to point out the silliness of the opposition, which seems to be based on Gates’ involvement, when Bill Gates isn’t really in business anymore, but more into philanthropy, so buying this is unlikely to enrich Gates by any meaningful amount.