partial_accumen

I’ve given you my opinion. I don’t have to back anything up.

Don’t sell yourself short. You’ve got apathy, malice or ignorance.

I don’t think things are getting worse. You do.

So you refuse to defend your spoken position with anything concrete, even though I’ve asked you about multiple specific examples that contradict your position.

And I don’t think any of this should add to the “hate” problem that some see on Lemmy. Which is the point of OP’s post.

Well why would you? You seem to be just fine with the destruction of lives around you, even making supporting statements that you think its good these things are happening to these people. Why do you think that your positions don’t deserve hateful responses? Lemmy doesn’t have a “hate” problem. Today’s leadership in the USA, and as a consequence, our society now does.

Hate isn’t the answer

I agree with that statement. However, your chosen positions are steeped in hate yet you defer or ignore it. That wreaks of hypocrisy on your part, and points back to the intellectual dishonesty I accused you of earlier.

You’re being intellectually dishonest if you are claiming your statement is true.

Just because I said something that you didn’t agree with doesn’t mean I was being “intellectually dishonest,” and it’s rude of you to imply that.

You can keep your false righteous indignation. How can you claim to tell person in an El Salvador prison right now its “no worse off”? Please, explain that to me. How about a fired federal worker? Is it “no worse off” for them now they’re unemployed?

I lived through the 80’s. Try living then and telling me that life is worse now. lol

I already told you I’m an older, well off, white man. Yes, I lived through the 80s too. How is that relevant at all? You’re we should be happy now because we don’t have 12% interest rates yet and stagflation is how we should be okay with trump destroying the world economy for likely the better part of the upcoming decade? Why stop your measure over 40 years ago, long before most of the people here were even born?

Why not tell interracial married couples “Try living in 1966 and not being able to get legally married to your spouse of a different race. lol”

Why not tell women and “Try living in 1918 and not being able to vote. lol”

I don’t think any of that is any worse off than it was a few years ago though.

You’re being intellectually dishonest if you are claiming your statement is true.

Can I ask if you are a white, well off, man?

I don’t think the world is getting “worse,” it’s just the doomscrollers on Lemmy wanting it to be worse to fit their own twisted narratives.

For many MANY groups it is getting objectively worse.

For those in the USA:

• if they are trans they are at risk for violence or legal consequences for simply going in a public bathroom.
• if they work for the federal government they have lost or are at risk for losing their livelihood.
• if the weren’t a natural born citizen of the USA they are at risk for deportation to a prison in El Salvador irrespective of their circumstances of student visa, asylum visa, green card holder, even naturalized citizens.
• if they are a women, their lives are now at risk from preventable disorders if they get pregnant
• if they are old or disabled they are now at risk of being declared dead and having their retirement Social Security income cut off
• if they are a child they are at risk of dying from preventable diseases (like measles or whooping cough) even with decades old effective vaccines available, but not used.
• if they are poor they are at risk for possible hunger and starvation as basic food assistance has been cut around the country deemed as “waste”
• if they are a veteran needing medical care they are now at risk from cuts to staff that facilitate care for the people that stood in defense of our nation.

For our great historical allies of Canada and Mexico:

• they are getting their economies destroyed because they trusted the USA to honor its own written treaties.

For the rest of the world:

• they just today the world got an unjustified kick in the shins with nearly global trade tariffs from the USA.

The only group that aren’t generally hurt yet are: well off older white men

As a member of that group I find it fucking disgusting what is being done to everyone that isn’t in this group at the hands of this group.

Hollywood Burbank Airport

Its the only airport I’ve ever flown in or out of that lets you board an deplane from both the front and back doors on a 737.

Baggage claim is actually outdoors! You get your bag and are standing about 30 feet from the arrivals pickup road.

Its a fun small airport with a prime location.

It would be cool if it could somehow integrate to a VPN and only do that while the VPN is active. I don’t think it’s possible, though

Potentially possible, but I agree, likely not worth the effort.

When was the last time you checked the length of your DHCP lease?

I’m past caring about giving my IP to a website that I want to use, but what this is doing is handing out your information to every single advertiser that is published on any page you visit. In some cases this plugin would match the definition of “leaking personal data”.

You do you though. I won’t stop you.

If you care about your information and privacy, why are you giving them your information for nothing?

That HTTP request would also show up in the advertisers web logs with your origin IP address.

My email provider allows for unlimited aliases. So, while I have 600+ email addresses, emails to them all end up in the same mailbox.

I do this too. The unique email address I create for each is identifiable to the place I’m using it. This has other benefits. If an organization you created and account with sells or has a data breech you know exactly which company it was when you start receiving spam or phishing email directed to that address. This is also nice because you can “black hole” that email address and all the spam goes with it even future spam not sent yet.

Unless the CEO also sits on the board of directors … but at least they won’t be making the decision unilaterally.

Exactly, and even then the CEO isn’t the final all-powerful boss.

The person that holds the office of CEO can also be as high as holding the Chairman of the Board role, which would give them incredible power in the organization. However, even then their decisions can be overridden in extreme cases by the rest of the board. I’ll admit that is pretty rare though.

It doesn’t work the way you’re describing for a bunch of reasons.

First, while everyone thinks the CEO is the boss, they aren’t. They are hired and fired by the Board of Directors. The Board has a strategic objective for the company and has tasked the CEO with making that strategy reality. So in your hypothetical, the Board may not be interested in developing new features or putting lots of resources into R&D at that time. Its also possible that the Board is wanting to pivot the company into a different business segment where that new features isn’t attractive to that customer base.

Lets assume for the moment the Board does have interest in the result $NewFeature might provide.

CEO does something like this:

• Contact Marketing and confirm our customer base would want this $NewFeature that $competitor developed. Also, we’ll need pricing strategy fairly quickly to know how much we will net out of implementing this $NewFeature or how much of our customer base we’ll lose to $competitor if we don’t have it in our product. Also, Marketing will need to come up with a new name for $NewFeature under our banner.

Those number from Marketing will give us an idea of our budget for building this $NewFeature

• Contact Legal and confirm that $NewFeature is not covered by any filed or pending patent or copyright claims. Take the name that Marketing came up with and search for existing copyright and trademark claims to see if we can use the new name or if we have to come up with something else. If there is existing IP covering the functionality, we need a breakdown on what that is to see if Marketing and CTO can make something else that does all or some of what $competitor’s $NewFeature does. Depending on how important $NewFeature is, don’t rule out licensing the IP from $competitors

• Ask CTO to work with the Project Management Office (which probably works under the COO) to come up with a rough Work Breakdown Structure and folding into a Project Plan with identified Milestones and rough release date. CTO will also need to provide a Resource Allocation (how many people, how expensive of people, and for how long) to complete the development of $NewFeature. This Resource Allocation will be folded in with the additional development costs of tools, etc, and compared against the number Marketing is providing to see if this is a good business decision to even pursue making $NewFeature.

There’s a bunch more, but this is a taste.

deleted by creator

Gotcha, on a re-read, I agree with you.

You know they’ll boost it after just a few months of timely payments, right?

Just to dismiss this myth. How many times you put charges on a credit card or how many payments you make has ZERO bearing on your credit score. The only thing you have to do is, when you have charges, pay on time. There isn’t even a measure for “you paid on time” there are negative measures of “you didn’t pay on time” though.

FICO score is only 5 things and they aren’t a secret. Its published right on their website for all to see.

source

Credit scores at total bullshit in the first place.

Credit scores are mostly fine. They do only one thing. They provide a good measure of how likely you are to pay back a loan. Thats it.

What other companies decide a credit score means and how they use that is bullshit.

You did more damage by canceling the cards than getting them and keeping them. In the end, had you kept the cards, it would have improved your score (even if you never put any charges on them because having the space counts positively toward your debt-to-credit ratio in FICO).

So far, speaking from experience, we saved loads of money DIY’ing it, even when deploying to the cloud, and we saved loads of time, in the long run.

First, I’m glad its working for you up to now. I’ve been in similar orgs. It works great, until it doesn’t. Have you had an production outage yet from a datacenter or hardware failure yet?

Should I ask home much did your Broadcom licensing renewal cost you this year?

If you hire talented workers, you save money and time, by DIYing the approach, as long as it’s done in a sane, and controlled manner.

Talented workers that know the systems are great, and if you’ve built your own systems and processes finely tuned to your specific applications performance needs and profiles, it also means you’ve got a highly specialized infrastructure and app stack. You’ve possibly built yourself a scaling problem because the skill needed to understand and maintain your well performing one-off solution isn’t ubiquitous. As your organization’s needs scale it will be tied directly to the additional limited specialized and expensive staff needed. Again, this may not be an issue with your org today, but it may not have hit this need yet. This is the “Only time will tell” component that is so important. As in, your sample size may not be large enough to know if your org made the right decision or not yet.