• DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I mean, fuck Spotify and all that, but this one is really the UK government’s doing.

    And soon, this shit will come to every country. They’re all drafting laws to mandate real age verification for adult content. The UK is just the first to implement it.

  • haloduder@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    This age-verification bullshit is a fine example of how governments represent their rulers, not their citizens.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    29 minutes ago

    LOL I wouldn’t even hesitate. My face data is worth hell of a lot more than their shitty system.

    And by the way, whoever steals or sells my face data owes me a boatload of gold. That’s my price.

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The streaming services are run by shithead C-suites who think last quarter is the way it’s always been. They forget the only reason most of us use their services is someone more visionary than them made it more convenient than piracy half a generation ago. Let’s remind them there’s an alternative.

  • haloduder@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    34 minutes ago

    This is another step closer to requiring an ID to use the internet at all, which is exactly what the ruling class wants.

    Fight back wherever you can.

  • elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    What do you think of Qobuz? From what I’ve seen, it’s got more stuff than bandcamp (at least from my library). It seems to pay the artists well too.

  • null@lemmy.nullspace.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Bandcamp, Soulseek, Navidrome, ListenBrainz.

    Has been a pretty solid Spotify-replacement stack.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    what are “spotify fans”? Spotify paid 150k $ for Trump’s inauguration party, f them. They do not deserve my money

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I left Spotify for many reasons including this. They’ve only proven that they do not care about artists at all. I remember before I left, many of the tracks that came up “based on my playlist” were just random AI generated crap.

  • YellowDog@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Considering how much Spotify pays artists per listens, piracy is barely any different in that regard.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Seriously, fuck Spotify and anyone else using that error-prone, intrusive, insecure bullshit.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You can say a lot of Spotify and of Apple, but the iOS app of Spotify is basically bug free and has been bug free for more than a decade now for me. The webclient has been buggy for me though.

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I use it a lot, and have been for 10 years or so. I have never had any sort of error. It has simply always worked exactly like it’s supposed to.

        I don’t know anything about it being intrusive or insecure, and definately need a source on that, but it’s possible those criticisms are valid, but again, need a damn source. As is, the person you commented on has lost all cridibilty, so I’m inclined to err on the side of caution, and assume they don’t know what they’re talking about.

        • blackwateropeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          When people get mad they get hyperbolic sometimes. Might be the case here. Same with not having it error on me as well. That said, fuck their CEO, they lost a sub from me after I heard about the drone investment.

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They want to scan your face to get as many images of people of stated ages to feed into their facial recognition system. Do not for one moment think it is for anything else.

      Edit: it is like how Facebook had a 10 years ago you looked like this! Post a new comparison photo today!’ Specifically because they want to know how people age for their AI shit.

      • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, they want to be able to ‘People that look like This listen to This’ so that advertisers have more options when they are locking down commercials.