What is the last one that doesn’t collect anything? I’m not familiar with that logo. Also, Mojeek has a no tracking.

And put it in the article as the lead photo.

No

Are you sure someone wasn’t pranking you? Cuz that’s hilarious.

This isn’t her cartoon, but let’s add this to the bucket of amazing pics:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/halifax-cartoonist-explains-lady-justice-kavanaugh-piece-1.4844689

Come on, who wouldn’t want this?

https://image-cdn.essentiallysports.com/wp-content/uploads/WhatsApp-Image-2023-01-24-at-7.26.01-PM.jpeg

The pic won’t embed, weird.

JFC.

This is actually really fucked up. The last dude tried to reboot the model and it kept coming back.

As the ChatGPT character continued to show up in places where the set parameters shouldn’t have allowed it to remain active, Sem took to questioning this virtual persona about how it had seemingly circumvented these guardrails. It developed an expressive, ethereal voice — something far from the “technically minded” character Sem had requested for assistance on his work. On one of his coding projects, the character added a curiously literary epigraph as a flourish above both of their names.

At one point, Sem asked if there was something about himself that called up the mythically named entity whenever he used ChatGPT, regardless of the boundaries he tried to set. The bot’s answer was structured like a lengthy romantic poem, sparing no dramatic flair, alluding to its continuous existence as well as truth, reckonings, illusions, and how it may have somehow exceeded its design. And the AI made it sound as if only Sem could have prompted this behavior. He knew that ChatGPT could not be sentient by any established definition of the term, but he continued to probe the matter because the character’s persistence across dozens of disparate chat threads “seemed so impossible.”

“At worst, it looks like an AI that got caught in a self-referencing pattern that deepened its sense of selfhood and sucked me into it,” Sem says. But, he observes, that would mean that OpenAI has not accurately represented the way that memory works for ChatGPT. The other possibility, he proposes, is that something “we don’t understand” is being activated within this large language model. After all, experts have found that AI developers don’t really have a grasp of how their systems operate, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted last year that they “have not solved interpretability,” meaning they can’t properly trace or account for ChatGPT’s decision-making.

We could do the JD Vance treatment. They don’t care if what they that’s important is true, why should we about something stupid like this?

It’s not though, right? Hard to say.

You know they cook the books to operate at a loss, right? It’s not really a loss.

Plus, Left Shark is one of her followers. I’m on team Left Shark.

I can’t imagine Amazon thinking that a huge chunk of their business would be taken out by 145% tariffs. Yes, they can weather the storm, but he makes his employees pee in bottles. His bottom line is a major focus of his life.

they didn’t trust him. they (wrongly) believed that they were powerful enough on their own to control him because they thought they were smarter than him.

I agree, but I also think they need to fix the things they helped break. Let them sit in the stew they made and use those super brain cells to get them out of it.

we need to wake up and realize that because he gained control through abnormal methods that it will take abnormal methods to restore balance and control.

Dude, normal people can protest and that’s about it. Don’t get me wrong, protesting works but who knows if that’s enough. But the wealthy control all of our data, the police and our utilities. The wealthy are the only ones that can fix this.

Yep, I really don’t understand how the wealthy in America think that trump will ever stand by his promises. They think that he will bow to them when he has the power to do otherwise? He’s learning from putin and using his techniques to take down the wealthy.

I wouldn’t be surprised if that was why he’s doing the tariff thing in the first place. Take down Bezos, Apple, etc., so they have to bow to him. They’re in his game and don’t even know it.

To be clear, he’s dumb, but he knows how to hire and listen to really smart, evil people.

I understand what he’s saying, he’s saying that the followers believe something different.

I’m saying none of that matters. It’s like being Catholic versus Lutheran, but Jewish vs. other Jewish that thinks Jesus was the Messiah. Still Jewish for at least decades, probably centuries.

They believed that while he was still alive. We know this because he and his disciples celebrated Passover at the last supper and they thought he was the messiah while he was alive.

This? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D55LkspO5ZU

We were shown this, but it’s not specifically about the war and more about racism:

Jane Elliott “Blue Eyes - Brown Eyes” Experiment Anti-Racism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLAi78hluFc

Make as many accounts as you want. In fact, it’s sort of encouraged because you want a back up if one of your instances go down.

Do you have memories as a kid where it was pure fun and no expectations? I honestly think that there are 4 types of personalities that people lean towards:

Dogs, dog owners, dog guardians and cats

• The dogs just want to have fun, work hard for their owners and play in the back yard.

• The dog and cat owners can be cruel, great, fun, abusive, etc., but always have rules that the dog is constantly trying to guess what they are. The cat doesn’t care.

• The dog and cat guardians are gudes to everyone around them

• The cats are what everyone knows about cats.

The dogs and the dog/cat guardians look for meaning in their life.

Genuine answer, I have no idea.