• recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Yes.

    Do you know any dopamine addicts who lost their minds for a week straight? You know the ones. Giving more permissions to shady apps to scratch their itch?

    Sad world we live in lolol.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yeah, the super obvious political stunt was a political stunt. It only fools those that don’t pay any attention or don’t know how anything works. Biden said he would not enforce the order, that trump signed during his first term, to ban tiktok. Then tiktok chose to shut itself down for a day and chose to turn itself back on with its political pandering notice. It is all to manipulate it’s users while also paying fealty to the incoming president (because China knows that is how easy he is to control).

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It likely was, hell it had me fooled. I was honestly about to say “Maybe I was wrong about him? Maybe Kamala losing won’t be so bad…”

    But then he signed the Transgender order and on the same day Musk did the Nazi salute and I’m like “And this is what I get for questioning my own world view.”

    At least I voted Harris in the election and spent literally only two or three days (17-20) being fooled, and let’s be honest, it was Copium, not truly being swayed

  • CixoUwUA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yes, I also think that was bait, because ban started few days before begin of Trump term and ban was not really working. It had a lot of bugs, simple VPN could byoass it, “YES, user who logged in ONLY from USA and now loggin from Europ REALLY IS NOT AN AMERICAN NOW!!!”. That two things make me to think it was a bait.

  • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    16 hours ago

    All CEOs understood how to behave with such an arrogant person: flatter him and he will bow to your every wims.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Bow even harder and you get pardoned for every crime you did…

      Who came up with this pardon shit anyway?!

  • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Trump started the whole thing because he was unpopular on Tiktok. Republicans jumped on board because young people were politically organizing on the platform and they don’t like that.

    But up to that point, there was no really effort, even as much as they tried to claim “national security”.

    Then when the real information about Palestine was being spread there the democrats jumped on board because they are the same as republicans when if comes to foreign policy.

    That’s what started the actual push that gained momentum. They had no actual evidence about the stuff they claimed. Also, if the claim applied to Tiktok, it applies to all the other social media. But they don’t actually care about privacy. They only care about a platform that they couldn’t control and wasn’t catering to them.

    If they cared about privacy, they would have pushed general privacy legislation and/or regulation and oversight on all social media.

    The reversal was Biden realizing he does not have a good legacy and with Trump, there was a lot more content this time around that was pro-trump (and also tiktok gave him a million dollars). So now he gets to claim he “saved tiktolk” when he was the start of the whole thing.

  • Letme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Sort of, yes. It is a counterintelligence/disinformation app, and for that reason it makes MAGA look good. MAGA now controls all 3 of the top disinformation apps: Twitter, Facebook , and Tiktok. This is the war on truth; facts and honesty lost.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not to mention they’ve bought out every previously legitimate news source.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Lmao, yes.

    He “brought it back” before he was even in office. And since no one looks up anything, I’m sure it did it’s job.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      How do people not see through this theatre? It wasn’t even subtle. Oh right, the brainrot…

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I feel like this is an incredibly obvious yes. They were down for 12 hours. They put Trump’s name as their savior in the error message… Then the CEO shows up to his inauguration. Trump freely admits that it is because he believes TikTok helped him win the election:

    “I have a warm spot in my heart for TikTok because I won youth by 34 points,” Trump said in December. “And there are those that say TikTok had something to do with that.”

    So. Yeah. Of fucking course it was. Fuck national security and all that nonsense, ME ME ME!

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Trump’s basically a fractal hypocrisy, which is, as I understand it, why and how the grift keeps grifting.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      How so? It was politically convenient to go after TikTok when he did it, and it’s politically convenient to reverse course now. That’s a pretty consistent gameplan from Trump, attack something when it’s popular, reverse when reversing is popular.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It is more in line with a puppet, that has zero understanding of anything, being told what to say as it is convenient.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Hypocrisy: The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness.

        Holding a position when politically convenient and reversing your stance on that position due to political convenience is hypocrisy. It may be typical and expected, but it’s still hypocrisy.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          But Trump has no values or beliefs, the only thing he’s consistent about it putting his name in headlines. So reversing is absolutely consistent with his values.

          • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Hypocrisy: The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess

            Having no values or beliefs and being self-consistent with ulterior personal values does not change the definition of the word.

            If one professes beliefs, feelings, or values that one does not possess, one is a hypocrite.

              • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                Yes.

                Profess: 1) To affirm openly; declare or claim. 2) To make a pretense of; pretend.

                If one makes a pretense of holding beliefs, feelings, or values that one does not hold, one is a hypocrite.

                Whether anyone else understands the pretenses of the hypocrite or not does not change the definitions of the words.

          • Windex007@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            So what you’re saying is he professes to have beliefs which he doesn’t actually have?

              • Windex007@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                23 hours ago

                That’s irrelevant. When he says “I believe X”, he is professing that he believes something. Just because we know he’s lying doesn’t mean he isn’t saying it.

                That kinda logic scares the hell out of me, btw. People are just so numb to it that it’s like their brains are short circuiting.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  That’s kind of like random people confessing to killing Brian Thompson. Is it really a confession if everyone knows you’re lying? Likewise, is it really a protestation if neither the speaker nor listener believes it?

          • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            It used to be that politicians suffered in the polls when they flip flopped, but the only one Trump would suffer is if he went against his base.

            Like when he floated that maybe the covid vaccine was ok.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Honestly, his base tends to follow him, so as long as it’s not a core belief, he could flip on a number of things without incident.

              It’s disgusting and I really don’t understand why his base tolerates it.

              • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I really don’t understand why his base tolerates it.

                Because the relationship between him and his “base” isn’t one between citizens and politician, it’s a literally a cult following their leader.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        When he came with the ban idea he used the same argument of national security that is the hypocritical part. Like you say the real reason is just political convenient

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          He also claimed national security when he messed with tariffs. At this point, it’s just an excuse to do something to grab headlines.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      If we were talking about a sane person, I don’t see why a person cannot change his mind.

      Trump is just playing the fools.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Trump doesn’t have a mind to change. I doubt he even remembers he ever proposed a ban and this is just some advisor telling him that doing the opposite of Biden will get him likes.