println!("{comment}");

C’mon, it’s 2025!

no reason to believe it violates “democratic values”

In my country the law is one of the pillars of democracy, but you do you 👍

And I think “vibe” means that they have no experience with programming so they can’t read the code they copy.

At least it was Americans talking on an american platform. I wouldn’t be surprised if we had french Europeans leaders having occasionally this kind of discussions on Microsoft Teams or some Google chat.

On Signal you can verify user identify, and you should absolutely do it if were to discuss national security maters.

This is not a hidden feature, I think it’s designed to prevent man in the middle attack. It also work against the “oops I accidentally added a journalist to my conversation no one should know of”, which is so dumb that no one saw this coming 😅

If you were to discuss national security maters with someone, please just verify your safety numbers, IRL or through another safe and verified channel 🙄

Can we stop benchmarking text generation models on things they’re not designed to do and start educating people on what they actually can do?

Oh no we can’t, there’s already hundreds of commercial services…

So often 😭

I think I was thinking about desktop apps when I answered, but I feel out of context now 😬

Isn’t it about a web engine being roughly 60MB? 😕

Wasn’t XP more reliable than the average of Windows versions?

But it’s easier to block trackers & ads on a PWA, and life made me very cynical about “the industry” 😅

He would have to eat part of a battery. It was, he figured, maybe the only way to solve his problem.

I thought this was metaphorical 🤦 My idiocratie radars are all saturating since the middle of the article.

Man, we’re not even 3 months in (6%) and everyone starts preparing for world war 3. Americans needs to step up now.

Well, the comment that showed bust above yours shows an article from NYT doing exactly that 😮‍💨

(From webghodt0101 : https://lemmy.ml/comment/17118372)

deleted by creator

A bit out of context my you recall me of some thinking I heard recently about lying vs. bullshitting.

Lying, as you said, requires quite a lot of energy : you need an idea of what the truth is and you engage yourself in a long-term struggle to maintain your lie and keep it coherent as the world goes on.

Bullshit on the other hand is much more accessible : you just have to say things and never look back on them. It’s very easy to pile a ton of them and it’s much harder to attack you about any of them because they’re much less consequent.

So in that view, a bullshitter doesn’t give any shit about the truth, while a liar is a bit more “noble”. 0

You don’t need any knowledge of computers to understand how big of a deal it would be if we actually built a reliable fact machine. For me the only possible explanation is to not care enough to try and think about it for a second.

I’ve been willingly enabling data collection features for Mozilla but I guess that time is revolute, they don’t feel trustworthy anymore.

Well I suppose LibreWolf (or some other de-branded Firefox) will become more mainstream. Similar to what chromium is to chrome 🤷