• Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I imagine some archivists might find the lost fragments of this server is some ruins and by some miracle, maybe extract this very thread.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “It’s my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of sommbitch or another.”

    No one needs to remember me except my kids. Maybe my grandkids.

  • gigachad@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I am doing Genealogy as a hobby and in most of the lines I am in the 18the century, in some in the 17th century.

    What I learned during this hobby is a simple thing - the more generations you go back, the more ancestors you have - the formula is 2^n. So if you go back 10 generations, you have roughly 1,024 ancestors.

    Now imagine how many descendants these people have? I have met plenty of others nerds who are also doing genealogy, cousins by 7the grade and so on. There is always some dude doing this stuff, so I am pretty sure there will be one in the future.

    Of course I can only go back about 300-350 years, but we people today are leaving way more traces on this planet than my ancestors in the 17th century.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Brave of you to assume that humanity will exist in 600 years.

    Actually, we might be, but the better-off ones will be back at sticks and stones and huddling around wood fires and the like.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I really doubt this. Humanity is really good at surviving things.

      My prediction - at a certain point, we gain the ability to port human brains to computers. The most wealthy gain this tech first, and effectively become immortal. Using their wealth (which is likely always accumulating) they are able to afford lots of redundency and good tech + energy to function at extremely high levels of performance - essentially making them immortal gods. I assume they will form alliances and rivalries, and stake out ground based on the now-general-intelligence AIs they have created.

      Most people who choose transhumanism after this will need to utilize their afterlife continuing to work in order to pay for the ongoing cost of running their servers.

      Meanwhile, humans still made of meat will have started conducting experiments on their genetics. Initially this will be about simply reducing or removing the chance of carrying a genetic disease. But soon they will start working on how to generally be better than others - improved cognitive abilities; sexier, stronger bodies; improved emotional regulation. Not long after, it will start being considered irresponsible to have children without the standard genetic modifications that the middle class can afford. Permanent class stratifications will be etched into dna. Even further along, the rich take genetic modification into fashion, creating physical markers of class stratification which will gradually make them look less human. As genetic class differences widen, there will be increasing class wars - in each one, the upper classes and those aligned with them will eliminate more and more of the lower classes. Slavery will also make a comeback, as those without genetic modifications (or with sufficiently lesser modifications) will be deemed too irresponsible to manage their own affairs and function in society. The descendents of the ultra-rich transhumanist gods, who will have the best and most fashionable genetic modifications, will be the first to achieve immortality in the flesh. But there will probably develop a sort of cultural expectation that they eventually give up their flesh and become transhumans like their anscestors.

      Therefore, I will not have children unless I earn enough to afford their genetic modifications. To do otherwise would be irresponsible.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    My name is on some US patents. Out of anything, I expect those to have the best odds of surviving for 600 years. Of course no one will look them up in 600 years unless they have really niche interests.

  • snooggums@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The vast, vast majority of people are forgotten within 100 years. Pretty much need to be in an extremely high position where records are kept, like presidents, or do something extraordinarily positive or negative.

    I strongly doubt anyone reading this post will be remembered after the people they met or interacted with directly have died.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I actually have a geneology book (族谱) from my paternal lineage (everybody does this in China). Its just a bunch of names, and some history of the village summarized. I hate tradition and I’m already in the US right now, I dont give a shit about the stupid geneology book anymore, my ancesters will probably be so pisses to find out that I totally ignored all the hard efforts lol. (My village still has a copy, but I’m not adding more name to the stupid thing, a waste of time, its also misogynistic AF, if there’s a daugher, then the lineage doesn’t record their decendents. So dumb, as I guy, I hate this patriarchal bullshit)

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Some aspects of that tradition are commendable, though. It would be neat to see this updated in a less male-centric fashion.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      With the U.S. only being 250 years old, I can’t say anyone would remember presidents in 600 years. If the U.S. is gone there will likely be mention of 1 president that was in power when whatever came and took/changed it. During the planetary destruction revolution there was a plethora of wasteful greed. They called it an industrial revolution that ran rampant with greed and wastefulness.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        History preserved the names of heads of state from countries that had a much shorter existence or impact. 600 years might seem a long time to Americans but it’s not that long for historical memory.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Sure, then everything in history would be “remembered” forever… Except no one would know or care. To me, that is not remembered.

          I would say Jesus is forgotten completely at this point even though he is written/read everywhere

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We record these kinds of things in archives as they go along. Hell, we have records of Egyptian and Roman leadership going back centuries.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While that’s true, we have much more extensive record keeping these days. I’ve been researching my family tree, and 100 years ago there were still a decent number of people who were mostly illiterate. Add to that documents like the census being handwritten in cursive on paper, and you get lots of errors being recorded, and the records themselves being damaged by age.

      Unless something drastic happens, a lot of our records will still exist in the centuries to come. It will mostly be our official records, but they should still be there :)

        • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s not just names in lists though. Using my mother’s grandparents as examples, I know where they were born and grew up, I know who they lived with at multiple points in their lives, and I know a few of the places where they lived.

          I know where and when they got married, and some of the guests, and I know what children they had and when. As they were adults at the time, I know some of what my great grandfather was doing during the first World War and how he died.

          I haven’t done a deep dive into their lives yet as I’ve been working backwards, but I’ve already got a decent idea about who they were and what they were like. I know a fair bit about his parents and family too, as I checked that side first.

          The biggest issues are finding photos, and the cost and availability of records. There are not many photos due to them not being as pervasive at the time, and there are not many records because a lot of things either weren’t recorded or weren’t saved. Both of those can be solved with the technology we have now. Lots of people have their own information saved, separate to the official sources, and it’s easier to have multiple copies of everything, so they won’t get lost or destroyed as easily.

          Hopefully this means that we’ll remember more of the past going forwards :)

    • Lena@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s quite sad tbh, we’re all just tiny specks on the timeline of humans

      • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Perhaps but what is the value of human life? Being remembered of living and enjoying life? You won’t be around to care that no one remembers you, but you are here to enjoy life right now. So why be bothered by what people in 600 years are up to.

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s your’s to make of it what you will. It doesn’t have to be sad. It’s pretty incredible any of us are here in the first place with how many conditions had to be present for life to even be on earth. And then we evolved from single cell organisms into these complex beings that we are today. It’s pretty fucking nuts and fascinating.

      • snooggums@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I am 100% in favor of being forgotten, because trying to stand out in the sea of billions of people is a ridiculous expectation.

  • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Doesn’t even take that long. My parent passed away and left boxes of pictures from 50 to 75 years ago and no one recognizes. Why did they have these pictures and boxes of them? No notes. Nothing.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There was a pic of my great-great-grandparents on the wall. No idea what their name was.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think humans might, but we won’t have fancy skyscrapers, we’ll be living in bunkers hiding from whatever disaster (war, plague, radiation, alien invasion) is on the surface.

      • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I find it odd that natural disaster isn’t on your list considering it’s by far the most realistic scenario. Hell, it’s already happening.

        I guess the word “natural” isn’t very accurate for a climate disaster, but still, it’s not on your list.

        • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Technically, climate change by itself isn’t what will destroy civilization, its the aftermath, mainly, the crops wouldn’t be able to grow properly in a fucked up temperaure, weather, ecosystem…

          Similar to “old age” in humans, nobody “dies of old age” in of itself, rather, its the complications that result from old age.

      • Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We sure are a dumb species. We’re able to construct all this stuff using the world around us but we can’t seems to figure out working together instead of constantly competing

  • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    History from this period will feast or famine. If the Internet Archive is preserved long term, then your words on the Internet will be there. If not, then bitrot will happen within decades.

    The feast result will be an interesting one for historians. We don’t usually have historical records about common people of any era more than a century or two back. “History is written by the victors” isn’t quite right. History is written by writers, and for most of history, those would be educated upper class people.

    Historians love finding Roman graffiti, even when it’s about some guy’s giant cock. So yes, they’ll be interested in your memes, too.