I know there was some schism and moving of instances, but beyond that I can’t deduce what happened/is happening.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s a broader disagreement that’s been simmering for a while. The 196 mods say that the Drag controversy is unrelated, as Dragonfucker had been banned from 196 long before for unrelated reasons.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s not what they were saying when Ada said neopronouns aren’t trolling. This thing they’re saying now seems like a PR line to avoid getting the community outright taken by Ada.

      At present, drag is banned from 196 for advocating violence against Nazis, but at the time, the ban was for “trolling” after making several posts in support of neopronouns.

      • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Neopronouns aren’t trolling. I don’t think I’ve seen anyone saying otherwise. I believe YOU are though. There’s a wake of drama behind you miles long.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      The 196 mods say that the Drag controversy is unrelated, as Dragonfucker had been banned from 196 long before for unrelated reasons.

      Although…this is some sort of spat relating to pronouns, and as I recall, isn’t that guy’s thing referring to himself using the third person?

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The spat is unrelated to pronouns or neopronouns, according to the 196 mods. It has to do with the Blahaj admins and the 196 mods disagreeing on moderation behavior for the community, and the 196 mods not wanting to have their own moderation decisions reversed or second-guessed by admins if there wasn’t a rule violation in how the 196 mods handled moderation.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            As I understand it, it wasn’t a singular disagreement, but a number of incidents in which, as I said, the 196 mods didn’t want to have their own moderation decisions reversed or second-guessed if 196’s ruleset was in compliance with the requirements of the instance.

            • TransfemGhostface@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Ah. Well, that seems like a shitty excuse. They’re public servants, they chose this role, they should just be made to deal with that. If they don’t want to have to deal with rules preventing them from abusing their fellow users, they shouldn’t be mods and should just spend their free time playing video games instead. They remind me of cop characters on police procedural tv shows that are mad that liberal politicians won’t let them commit brutality against and trample all over the civil rights of the citizens they’re supposed to be protecting

              I’m also going to be completely blunt, I don’t believe you that having to respect the choice of pronouns of transgender users isn’t the issue for them. I think you’re lying through your teeth to cover for them.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                If they don’t want to have to deal with rules preventing them from abusing their fellow users

                That’s… not at all what I said.

                I’m also going to be completely blunt, I don’t believe you that having to respect the choice of pronouns of transgender users isn’t the issue. I think you’re lying to cover for them.

                I’m lying to cover for the trans folk on the mod team saying that they will continue to respect neopronouns and enforce rules against misgendering on the .world comm.

                Uh.

                Okay.

                • TransfemGhostface@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Oh, I know. I’m just accurately depicting what those mods are ACTUALLY mad about.

                  Not being a transphobe is really simple. Someone tells you “Hello, nice to meet you! I identify as ____, my pronouns are /.” If you respect their self-identity and chosen pronouns, then congratulations, you’re not a transphobe! You all failed this test. You all failed it hard. There’s been one transgender individual in this entire drama. Dragon Rider. Dragon Rider has been repeatedly been referred to as a guy and with the pronouns he/him, despite constantly stressing that drag is non-binary and uses drag/dragself pronouns. Including val, someone you did not correct in this very conversation. Drag has been called a troll for defending dragself for months on end now. If I was one of the trans people your side of this argument was supposedly trying to protect, I would be very scared for my safety on this website.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Right, but, uh, weren’t you specifically one of the people who Ada banned actioned even though the 196 mods didn’t want you banned actioned, because you said on 196 that a nonbinary gender identity wasn’t valid? Which is an instance rules violation and not the mods’ decision on whether to action?

          The story you’re telling seems very relevant to pronouns and gender if your personal history is included.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Right, but, uh, weren’t you specifically one of the people who Ada banned even though the 196 mods didn’t want you banned, because you said on 196 that a nonbinary gender identity wasn’t valid?

            No, but nice try. Very typical of your brand of trolling.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              You’re right, drag misremembered there being a ban. It was actually just post locks and comment removals by Ada when you said that queerphobic stuff the mods wouldn’t remove.

              Thank you for the correction, drag is sorry for the mistake. Together, we’re getting to the truth.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                The locked post isn’t even on Blahaj. The removed comment, that I was leaving because of disagreements with the admins but acknowledged their right to make such decisions, was hilariously petty in the vein of Ada removing posts (and handing out bans) for people saying things like “Dragons aren’t real”. Nor am I at any point defended by the 196 mods.

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  You very deliberately said you don’t acknowledge drag’s gender, and in the same comment acknowledged that your view isn’t welcome on Blahaj. How is it petty for an admin to enforce the rules you knew and admitted you were breaking?

                  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    “I acknowledge that the recent position of the admins means I am no longer welcome here, and will thus be leaving. I wish them all the best.”

                    “How DARE you say that out loud? Removed”

          • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You know damn well it has nothing to do with pronouns. It’s about your abuse of them. You’re just making the “attack helicopter” argument, but in a way that’s subtle enough to be believable by those gullible enough to be taken advantage of.

            You’ve been banned from several instances for trolling, and finally found one that buys into it- thus creating even more of that savory drama for yourself.