• 0 Posts
  • 228 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worlddemocrats got this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Name one moment in history where abstaining from the bare mimimim to avoid catastrophic consequences results in a net gain.

    I ask this because you’re trying to make this party thing where I’d title paring attention and reading for context- you’ll see clearly that It’s an ACTION thing.

    Interesting that you went to progressives so quickly though. Especially since I never even mentioned the word.

    That says a LOT.


  • Rhoeri@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worlddemocrats got this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    As I said in another thread elsewhere on the same subject a while back:

    The Protest Vote Paradox™

    As we’ve all read time after time in the months leading up to the election, the Protest Vote™ simply states states that:

    “We refuse to vote against a Tyrant-Felon in order to send a clear and concise message that we will not stand for [roll D20 for random popular single issue], and alongside our refusal to vote against the Tyrant-Felon, is a collective hope that the aforementioned clear and concise message- if ignored, is received under unmitigated duress!”

    -Cut to Tyrant-Felon’s win, and the aftermath:

    Whether observed or not, the behavior of the Protest Voter will attempt to achieve the following:
    • Obnoxiously tell everyone: “We told you all what would happen!”
    • Onnoxiously claim there is: “No way protest voting could cause trump to win.”

    As both of these options cannot simultaneously be true in the same reality without breaking important time-space things that we would probably prefer not be broken- we are left with only a few logical conclusions:

    1. Protest voters have no idea what they’re talking about.
    2. Protest voters don’t understand the concept of hypocrisy.
    3. Protest voters have somehow learned to defy reality and become exempt from the concept of paradoxes, thus creating an entirely new study of theoretical science, known as Bulletproof Symbiotic Hypocrisy Theory, or BLsHt.

    Something, something, something Ted Talk.



  • Rhoeri@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worlddemocrats got this
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    So all the judges stopping his bullshit from passing is nothing? Along with the judges that overturn his bullshit, that’s nothing also? And Corey Booker’s 19 hour long (and counting) filibuster is nothing? What about all the people that actually VOTED to try and stop this from happening in the first place? Or the people that fucking warned you this would happen.

    Nothing?

    You all seem to have an odd definition of “doing nothing” that’s for sure. Maybe if you all… did nothing instead of staying home during an election we’d be in a much better place.






  • Rhoeri@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world*Tap tap tap*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    They were programmed through the magic of Designer Outrage™ that unless there is zero genocide happening in Palestine¹, they and everyone else should abstain from voting.

    ¹ Ukraine was not mentioned because they couldn’t give a shit about the atrocities committed elsewhere as long as they could disrupt the election in America.









  • And whether it’s mainstream media, or a random nobody on lemmy stating an opinion- most people will disregard it if they either don’t care about, or disagree with it.

    So now, having said this- take a guess who you think should care more about your opinion here than that of Elon Musk’s daughter elsewhere in a news article:

    Hint- If you guess “no one,” you’d be correct.

    (I’d also accept “both can be either relevant or irrelevant based on the interest of the reader and shouldn’t be subject to scrutiny just because you think it shouldn’t be stated”)