• kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    By default, WiFi Motion is set to detect even small amounts of movement in the motion-sensing areas, including motion caused by small pets.

    holy shit lol

  • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh boy, I can’t wait for this new wave of paranoid customers claiming their wifi is watching them. Thanks, comcast.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        “cheap” is a relative term.

        Nobody should be buying a DOCSIS 3.0 modem these days. They are obsolete and for some reason still being sold.

        A decent DOCSIS 3.1 modem is at least $200. A Next Gen like S34 is at least $220. At least at the big blue big box store. And then you have to get your own wifi.

        (However, that big blue store also will give you a 15% discount on any networking purchase if you recycle an old network device…I traded in an old modem but you should be able to find a switch or router at a thrift store and still come out ahead)

        It pays for itself pretty quick (by not paying rental fees), but that doesn’t necessarily make it cheap.

        I absolutely prefer using my own equipment, and do…but it’s also worth mentioning that in many markets, Xfinity removed data caps if you have a rented modem.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 day ago

          If a DOCSIS 3.0 modem still can’t be saturated by the tier of internet someone is paying for, what advantage would 3.1 have?

          • unphazed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah I recently switched from cable to fiber (finally available), and prior I was using an old as fuck modem/router that capped at 500Mbps. My internet at fastest was 380. I rarely transfer files over the network, so figured why bother? (I did have Gen1 Google Mesh though to cover dead spots). I had a bit of a shopping splurge when I got fiber. Nothing crazy, just an upgraded mesh and a switch (Why the fuck does Frontier provide an ONT with 8 ethernet ports but only one is active?)

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Not buying another modem when the ISP quietly upgrades the CMTS and makes more speed available in your neighborhood.

          • CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            At least in my case, my DOC IS 3.0 modem was having connectivity issues. My neighbor in another apartment had similar issues: dropped connections, slower than expected speeds, etc. Switching to DOCSIS 3.0 modems solved the problem. I guess Comcast upgraded their hardware and it wasn’t compatible with my modem anymore

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because docsis 3.0 standard is nearly 20 years old at this point and 3.1 is significantly faster. Docsis 3.1 is only 15, but 4 (which is still 8 years old) probably isn’t supported by your ISP yet. But the speed difference is quite noticeable. 3.0 will theoretically do 1gbps down, and 100-200 up, but 3.1 could do 10 down and 1gbps up. In the age of symmetrical fiber internet those upload speeds are dire. 3.1 realistically gets you a symmetrical gig connection.

            • ayaya@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I have a 3.1 modem but my ISP only has 3.0 speeds as far as I can tell. 1000/100 is their highest plan so the extra doesn’t really do anything.

              My modem is 32x8 and I can see in the UI that only 4 of the 8 upload channels are actually bonded to reach that 100, which is half of the 200 that 3.0 can theoretically do.

        • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It looks like DOCSIS 3.0 and 3.1 are for coax which should be avoid anyway . VodafoneZiggo is already starting with DOCSIS 4.0.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I still use coax because I buy internet from a reseller third party and this is what they have. I have 400/50 for 35$, which is a lot cheaper yhan the competitors. No reason for me to change.

            • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Like I responded in the other comment, I can get fibre with 4 times the download speed and 16 times the upload speed for the same amount of money. And that is pretty standard since it is apparently a way cheaper thing to offer for companies.

          • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Can confirm, I live out in the countryside with only coax available, and a measly 1Gbit down 150Mbit up and 9 - 11ms ping. No caps.

            Wait, that’s awesome and steady and reliable. Expensive sure but with heavy multiperson usage and no noticeable issues, I am wondering WTF you’re on about unless it’s some weird edge case?

            Maybe you are referring to predatory business practices like oversubscribed lines? That’s not a technical problem.

            • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Coax is generally a terrible and more expensive option, lower speeds all around and a worse ping. Especially now with fibre being so standard you shouldn’t go for Coax if you have the choice.

              Currently I do not have the choice so I have to pay 40 euro a month for 100mbps down and 25mbps up, with fibre I get symetrical gigabit for 45 euro a month or 400mbps symetrical for 40 euro. That’s 16 times the upload speed for the same money. And the first party with their coax (VodafoneZiggo) sells their coax as a fiber-cable. Which is just misleading bullshit.

              Heck the 5G modem I had was unstable at times, but the download was 100-200mbs and I paid 25 euro a month for that.

            • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              5G modems are probably an option.

              Edit: never said it was a good option, just that it was an option.

              • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                19 hours ago

                While that may be “an option”, 5G sucks compared to coax service.

                Both are inferior to fiber by a long shot, but wired will always be better than cellular, which is limited spectrum and inconsistent.

                • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  It depends a bit on where you are and what you need, the speed of my 5G modem was a lot quicker than the coax options for the same money, and it was decently stable. My only issue was that I had like no upload speed.

                  I was also point out it was an option and it has it’s use cases

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wouldn’t trust them to not randomly enable WiFi, but you can also use their modem but disable any built in WiFi on it & still use your own router. ISPs continue to try to bundle their modem & router, which gives them complete access to your home network. Some lucky people have found fiber providers that let them use their own SFP.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You can use your own. But at every single point they’re going to tell you that your brand new top of the line modem, is out of date and is probably the problem of any issue that you’re having. They try so hard to gaslight customers in believing that you need to use their white labeled equipment. They want you to use their stuff and pay the fees so they can resell the Wi-Fi, and they have full control over your device.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I have successfully avoided cable up to this point, but I did use my own modem back when I used DSL. It wasn’t advertised anywhere, but I just took the details from their modem and called support for the last bit I needed and used my own. It worked well, and I had my router be separate so I was able to just toss the modem when I got better service.

      • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        In Europe that used to be the case, but that changed not that long ago. Now providers are legally obligated to allow you to get your own modem

      • astrsk@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, look on their website for compatible models, there’s a handful of affordable ones, many which perform better on higher tier connections too. Been using my own modems with Comcast for 25 years.

          • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m on Spectrum and have tons of friends that always complain they’re shit. Spectrum itself isn’t shit, it’s the garbage equipment they set you up with.

            Make sure whatever you get works well with IPv6. For whatever reason IPv4 can go out at random but their IPv6 has never failed me (in the Los Angeles area at least).

            • Ulrich@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I have always had my own router, just not the modem.

              And the only problem I have is intermittent outages, repeatedly increasing the price without my knowledge or consent, and high latency.

              • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                I bought my current one because IPv6 failed to provision on the one they gave me when I moved to a bigger apartment just two units away. I found some post on Reddit about the problem and it mentioned one that “ignores” the lack of IPv6 provisioning and does it anyway (I’m a programmer and IT geek but I don’t really understand cable/DOCSIS well).

                If the modem they provided is just a modem and it works well, I don’t think there’s much reason to get rid of it. But personally if it’s an all-in-one box that has “bridge” mode I’d still run away and just go with my own modem.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You need to use their modem quite often, but you don’t need to use their router. They’re usually “all in one” modem/router things these days, but they’re legally required to provide you with a modem in bridge mode if you ask — at that point, an Ethernet cable attached to their modem is effectively attached to the Internet, and you can put your own hardware inside (firewall, Wifi router, etc.).

        While you need to connect to their IP gateway, you don’t need to use their DNS services or anything but their IP gateway service.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I don’t think that’s true. Their techs may claim that, but you van buy compatible modems online and find a helpful phone support person to get the details you need. Read up a bit on it first because they’re not going to walk you through it.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have always had my own router. What is bridge mode? Can I do that?

          • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Bridge mode disables the router in the modem; if you have an admin account on the modem you should be able to enable it yourself; otherwise you need to get your ISP to enable it. It will turn off all the firewall and WiFi features on the modem.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well yeah. That’s what their tech does. And it’s why I have my ISP’s WiFi offering disabled and the antennas removed and run their router in bridged mode, hooked up to equipment I own that doesn’t call out to the Internet.

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Doesn’t matter for me, my neighbors use all that shit. There’s enough latent rf for them to triangulate literally everything happening nearby.

      • happydoors@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I live in an apartment building. I wonder if this is useless tech with dozens of WiFi networks from my neighbors going

        • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If anything it’s far more dangerous tech due to that. Let’s say you live in 304; They know who lives in 303, 305, 203, 204, 205, 403, 404, 405, and the likelihood that your neighbors aren’t as tech savvy and use ISP provided routers and modems means that they can use all of those sources to create a 3d image of you and your apartment with the proliferation of 2.4ghz and 5ghz to create a high resolution image that can track your lip movements and even your keystrokes on a computer. That basically just becomes a multi lens 3d camera recording at 5000 fps. The only way to avoid this is to faraday your entire apartment which ironically makes your signal much higher due to the deployment of countermeasures. The ol’ “huh, interesting, what are they hiding?” approach.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        It doesn’t really matter… the data is managed by a third party in another country. I have no real control over who gets access to it, intentionally or otherwise. Better that the data just doesn’t exist in the first place.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          At this point all the arguments about what nefarious could they possibly do with the data are busted. They answer is - our imagination and access to information is not rich enough to figure out today and it’s probably worse than what we can think of.

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Didn’t read the article, but it’s possible to get a 3d map with wifi. They can probably see you.

    There is no privacy or security.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They don’t need a 3D map, and the researchers who have rendered a 3D map need a lot of specialized software and resources.

      Xfinity doesn’t need that. They only need to know when people are online, what they’re looking at, and who/how many people are watching TV, and if there’s indication of pets in the house. That gives them an advertising gold mine of data.

  • rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t really understand how this works, so struggle to see any benefits (only drawbacks😐). It does make me thankful my provider is a small local company. Not the fastest, but probably no spying.

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you are interested I can try and find the article on it but a few years ago an article came out where they were able to use wifi signals with enough accuracy that they could see a password that you were typing on your keyboard!!

      But basically they use the way the wifi signal bounce off things to make an image in much the same way that echo location works

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Like - I’m excited about sensors that uses higher frequency versions of this for health monitoring. I think that’s a perfectly valid use. But also, in my use, I’d be installing it as an IoT device on a network I control, feeding data to services I own.

        This use - where it’s opt in for now, until they figure out how to monetize selling how much time you spend in front of the TV, in the kitchen, bedroom, or bathroom (paired with ‘anonymized’ data about what you’re looking at online in each space) is creepy as fuck.

        • BussyCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Is it really “opt in” or is the opt in only for them to give you the information that they collect? I haven’t read through any terms of service for it but my assumption is they are already selling that data