Opinions are often based on premises or observations or claimed facts, which are sometimes very objectively wrong.
I get what you’re complaining about but the ‘sanctity of opinion’ isn’t a strong argument.
Opinions are often based on premises or observations or claimed facts, which are sometimes very objectively wrong.
I get what you’re complaining about but the ‘sanctity of opinion’ isn’t a strong argument.
And yet, nobody who trumpets this as an issue really thinks hard about it as a philosophy. They just say stupid things like I am an absolutist, all speech should be free.
Then they turn around and complain about being defrauded lol.
My line for computational adequacy was crossed with the Core2Duo. Any chip since has been fine for everyday administration or household use, and they are still fine running linux.
Any Apple silicon including the M1 is now adequate even for high end production, setting a new low bar, and a new watershed.
The cartoon is a critique of capitalism, not automation. Maybe most voters or readers are missing that.
Anton Petrov is a solid science commentator. He mostly just reports and doesn’t do much conjecture unless he’s reporting on public discourse about the issue. He doesn’t rely on charisma, slick production, or sensationalism, even if he has ti play the algorithm game. Examine his extensive channel on youtube.
I guess the solution is for people with conservative values to stop associating so freely with subjugation addicts? Once conservative identity is dissociated from a wide spectrum of racist and classist bullshit, not to mention that we are entering an extinction level event of our own doing, then maybe the guilt by association will go away.