• qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t doubt you have a busy life. And that is not the subject at hand here.

    What should concern us, collectively, is that we are constantly being pushed the notion that we do not have enough time and that tech is always the solution, when it is not.

    I’m going to take a risk and say you write faster than you type and reaching for a pencil is quicker than launching a program.

    • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I most certainly don’t write faster than I type, and sending an email or a chat message certainly doesn’t take longer than finding something to write with and something to write on. There is a big factor of habit and lifestyle - I don’t usually write stuff down, so I don’t have prepared/assigned tools for that, but I use my computer a lot, so I do have software installed and tools/commands memorised.

      And, frankly, out of many possible options, plain text is something computers are really good at - there’s basically no risk of running out of space, it’s indexable and searchable, it’s editable, and it’s very universal.

      Things do get a bit more complex when you include formatting, and a lot more complicated when you start adding annotations or illustrations, or even just more freeform writing styles, but there’s still a major factor of habit - I don’t know what my note taking would look like if I had a habit of pen and paper, but I know I’m very comfortable with using tech for that, and it works great for me!

    • mang0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’m going to take a risk and say you write faster than you type

      I have a very hard time believing this. From some quick googling, it seems that experienced writers can do 40 wpm, which is really slow in comparison to an (even an inexperienced) typer. Also, typing has no risk of being unreadable, unlike writing (e.g. doctor’s written notes).

      and reaching for a pencil is quicker than launching a program.

      Maybe if your computer is really slow.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        An inexperienced typer might be slower than 40 wpm. I’ve seen people type maybe 10 words per minute using only index fingers and looking for every letter. An inexperienced touch typer is maybe 40-60 wpm range though.

        I do up to around 140 wpm which many people think is lightning fast but then there’s people who can do 250 and I can’t even comprehend being that fast. Goddamn Sean Wrona.

        Just to give some perspective.

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m going to take a risk and say you write faster than you type and reaching for a pencil is quicker than launching a program.

      Maybe for you, but opening KWrite takes only 5-6 key presses and I type much faster than I write

      • saigot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        And not just you, short hand used to be ubiquitous before the computer, now it’s all but extinct.

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not to mention the fact theyd be expecting me to write well enough to be able to reread it later. Even if I wrote it at half my typing speed I still would not be able to make that shit out.