103·
5 hours agoFirst, riots are illegal.
Only if you lose. Get your man in power by any means necessary and he will pardon you.
Protest what? He was just elected president.
Trump losing in 2020 was the only reason needed for a riot.
- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: November 14th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
0·2 days agoWhat would you recommend?
I was planning on Bambu because of perfect prints without any tuning, heated bed, enclosure, and multi material.
Anything under $2k.
This is what people are doing without any post processing :
There are no noticeable layer lines. It’s almost resin quality.
3·3 days agoIf it wasn’t for his claim that he was using AI instead of people, you’d have a point.
His success is making more money for himself, not creating a better product.
Isn’t layoffs his point?
The British Great Awakening preceded the American one and ended with the end of Enlightenment.
By your own admission, 1830 was not the age of Enlightenment.
From the wiki link I already posted:
" The outpouring of religious fervor and revival began in Kentucky and Tennessee in the 1790s and early 1800s"
The age of Enlightenment ended with a renewed religious fervor. It took decades for religious views to again be tempered before women were allowed to vote again.
What I know is that in medieval times gender roles were much more flexible and “undefined”
That doesn’t match any scholarship I’ve read. Medieval Europe was a patriarchy in the classic sense. Woman were second class citizens.
If you are thinking about that letter from Paul,
I’m no biblical scholar but it isn’t just Paul. Here are some quotes:
“Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says.” 1 Corinthians 14:34
“I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.” 1 Timothy 2:12
“For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in God used to adorn themselves. They submitted themselves to their own husbands,” 1 Peter 3:5
“To the woman he said, ‘I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.’” Genesis 3:16
“Youths oppress my people, women rule over them. My people, your guides lead you astray; they turn you from the path.” Isaiah 3:12
Current LLM’s aren’t that stupid. They do have limited learning. You give it a question, tell it where it’s wrong and it will remember and change all future replies with the new information you give it. You certainly can’t ask a goldfish to write a c program that blinks an led on a microcontroller. I have used it to get working programs to questions that were absolutely nowhere on the internet. So it didn’t just copy/paste something found.
? I claimed it was worse. Enlightenment made it a little better (women with property could vote), then religious reactionaries took it back temporarily.
I think it is self evident that most Christians have moved away from following the Bible as a moral code unlike the medieval Saints and founders of Protestism. For example the Bible explicitly prohibits women politicians and professors.
Well yeah, because they’re not infinite. ;)
1830 was post enlightenment. It was characterized by a return to religious fundamentalism known as the Second Great Awakening.
Yes, there was misogyny in the Church, but it was not so strong before.
Martin Luther was very into mysogeny.
https://margmowczko.com/misogynist-quotes-from-church-fathers/
Before that, medieval Saints like Augustine wrote against women.
I’m going to need a source for that. Because while there were attempts by some to scientifically justify their religious beliefs like racism and misogyny, the enlightenment was about following evidence without holding onto past dogma.
Apple should add “console” into their branding to solve all their problems.
The all new iPhone 17+ Console.
There isn’t any significant difference between a Switch and an iPhone
even with infinite context memory
Interestingly, infinite context memory is functionally identical to learning.
It seems wildly different but it’s the same as if you have already learned absolutely everything that there is to know. There is absolutely nothing you could do or ask that the infinite context memory doesn’t already have stored response ready to go.
It was invalid when he originally proposed it because it assumes a unique mystical ability for the atoms that make up our brains. For Searle the atoms in our brain have a quality that cannot be duplicated by other atoms simply because they aren’t in what he recognizes as a human being.
It’s why he claims the machine translation system system is incapable of understanding because the claim assumes it is possible.
It’s self contradictory. He won’t consider it possible because it hasn’t been shown to be possible.
Searle argued from his personal truth that a mystic soul is responsible for sapience.
His argument against a computer system having consciousness is this:
" In order for this reply to be remotely plausible, one must take it for granted that consciousness can be the product of an information processing “system”, and does not require anything resembling the actual biology of the brain."
-Searle
If you go by usage, I’d say the iPhone is primarily an entertainment device.
Meta has been promoting their Quest 3 AR desktop mode for productivity.
That’s because you posted it to Lemmy. Like Twitter, Facebook is not getting rid of fact checkers. Facebook is only getting rid of fact checkers that Zuckerberg either doesn’t like or doesn’t care about.
I assure you, “Zuck is a pedo” would be immediately deleted from Facebook if it got any views.
His transphobia makes sense now. He hates himself.