#Lemmy has a new (and only) #Atheist #community #Atheism #SocialMedia

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    As an atheist I never got the point of evangelizing atheism. Isn’t that half the problem with religions?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      When a person believes in a religion, they have trained their brains to ignore part of reality. Once you’ve trained your brain to do that, manipulative people can more easily abuse your brain into thinking other incorrect things.

      And that’s how you get MAGA

      So the purpose is less about evangelizing atheism, and more about fixing other people’s brains for the betterment of society.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Maybe. But the scientific method and logic are provably functional. You see a thing, you replicate the thing, you can then do more things.

          So it’s not a huge stretch to say that getting people to follow those methods is an improvement.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That really depends on how they follow them. For example, eugenics is scientifically sound. It’s morally depraved in practice, but the scientific method doesn’t account for ethics.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Is it though? Time and again it’s been shown that having a very wide basic genetic options is the healthiest for a species. Evolution favors adaptability.

              Now if you’re talking about weeding out and genetic issues, diseases, and known problems, yes. We do that today.

              • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                Is it though? Time and again it’s been shown that having a very wide basic genetic options is the healthiest for a species. Evolution favors adaptability.

                Depends what you select for. You could breed for intelligence, strength, etc and still maintain a diverse gene pool. Look what we’re done with dogs, ffs. It’s a scientifically valid practice. It doesn’t matter though because there’s no ethical way to do it.

                Now if you’re talking about weeding out and genetic issues, diseases, and known problems, yes. We do that today.

                Through gene therapy, yes. Eugenics implies selective breeding.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I do find it a bit distasteful sometimes but I’d disagree with you here. It’s a support group and the only way to wake up society to absurd flaws of religion is through community conciousness.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In my experience most of these online groups are just memes and stories about being superior to religious people. I had to bail on them because it was gross.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The atheism subreddit in particular is more toxic than any religious people I’ve encountered on the internet. I identify as discordian now specifically to distance myself from that kind of atheist.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          You’re saying that from a privilege of living where atheism is acceptable. For many its not and its a powerful tool for resisting religion.

      • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        True. I never got the point of it.

        But I’m atheist/agnostic in a place where nearly everyone else is. I guess it feels a bit different when you live somewhere where literally everyone else is religious.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Exactly. It’s clearly net positive for our society even if it can be cringe just by the sheer scale of religious oppression in the world.

          If atheism forum ate a baby every day it would still be a net positive because people on Lemmy forgot that religious freedom and freedom to be an atheist is not viable in big chunk of the world.

          Thats why so many atheist converts become such zealots. Imagine growing up in what essentially is spiritual North Korea and discovering freedom for the first time. That’s where many of these cringe atheist memes come from.