Musk doesn’t think you should care about other people because he doesn’t care about other people.

Musk thinks you should care about Elon Musk because he cares about Elon Musk.

Musk does not have the ability to understand that there is a contraction there.

Elon “empathy is the great failing of the west” Musk wants people to feel sorry for him?

Burn the whole thing down and start from scratch.

Had me in the first half, lost me in the second.

“If you stop testing you won’t have positive cases.”

Literally “If I don’t see it it doesn’t exist.”

Children have better object permanence than these fuckers.

Yes, but don’t let your self righteousness turn a budding class war back into a culture war.

If Republican voters are suddenly waking up and thinking “this isn’t right” smacking them down with “this is what you voted for” is not going to help your cause.

“Yes, you’re right, this shouldn’t be happening and we should work together to stop it.”

There is no article or comments in this thread about protests or attempts to halt this adminstration, nor anyone trying to discourage such actions.

Less than a third voted for him, too. Millions are disenfranchised and millions more recognize that there is no correlation between desires and outcomes when it comes to voting.

And these millions that couldn’t even bother to vote expect other countries to come save them?

Canada is also specifically targeting red states with retaliatory tariffs. Somehow I doubt that is the sort of “help for the American people” OP is asking for.

Why not?

Because it would justify any retaliation (including military) from Trump and his sycophants.

Of the people that were of age, were able, and did vote, just over half voted for Trump

Right, over 50% of people who did vote voted for Trump, and unless your arguing that everyone that did not vote did it as a result of voter suppression or intimidation, the % of people that just chose not to vote adds to the % of the population that were fine with this.

If the “popular vote” went to Kamala there would be an argument to be had, but it didn’t. By all available evidence this is what the USA voted for. Why is it the responsibility of other countries to intervene in what people voted for?

assuming voting tallies were accurate.

Provide some evidence that they weren’t and you’ll be far more likely to get support from other countries.

The collapse of the US will not, and is not happening in a vacuum

Correct, and I do not fault any government for not sending money to resistance groups in the US that they could be using to support their own population in the coming economic crash.

This just sounds like more selfish Americentrism, “Why aren’t other countries doing more to help America? Yes, America did it to it’s self, and now if other countries don’t spend considerable resources helping us then they are just being selfish!”

Providing support and resources for movements that are opposed to Project 2025 and the rise of fascism would be nice

So you expect countries with smaller militaries (ie. all of them) to openly fund groups opposing a democratically elected leader?

but at the least how about drawing a distinction between the fascists and anti fascists

We recognize the distinction, but you have to be aware that you are unfortunately a minority in the country. Less than a third of Americans actually voted against this.

Not everyone in Russia supports the war in Ukraine, and I 100% support anyone trying to leave Russia or the Russian military, but Russia as a country can get fucked and needs to collapse for the good of the world.

“nobody wants to work”

True, that’s why you have to pay them to get them to do it.

so many countries and people are saying good luck, get fucked.

What specifically do you think other countries should be doing?

Trump calling this “Domestic Terrorism” and threatening Tariffs in response in 3… 2…

Did the LLMs tell you that? It’s not hard to look up on your own:

Data centers, in particular, are responsible for an estimated 2% of electricity use in the U.S., consuming up to 50 times more energy than an average commercial building, and that number is only trending up as increasingly popular large language models (LLMs) become connected to data centers and eat up huge amounts of data. Based on current datacenter investment trends,LLMs could emit the equivalent of five billion U.S. cross-country flights in one year.

https://cse.engin.umich.edu/stories/power-hungry-ai-researchers-evaluate-energy-consumption-across-models

Far more than straightforward search engines that have the exact same information and don’t make shit up half the time.

Because we have better methods that are easier, cheaper, and less damaging to the environment. They are solving nothing and wasting a fuckton of resources to do so.

It’s like telling cavemen they don’t need fire because you can mount an expedition to the nearest valcanoe to cook food without the need for fuel then bring it back to them.

The best case scenario is the LLM tells you information that is already available on the internet, but 50% of the time it just makes shit up.

Because it’s not AI, it’s LLMs, and all LLMs do is guess what word most likely comes next in a sentence. That’s why they are terrible at answering questions and do things like suggest adding glue to the cheese on your pizza because somewhere in the training data some idiot said that.

The training data for LLMs come from the internet, and the internet is full of idiots.

The spokesperson did not answer questions about the frequency of ads or what cars were covered by the SiriusXM contract.

A spokesperson saying “we are looking into this” doesn’t actually mean it was never intended or that it has stopped.

This was most likely a bug and it probably has been fixed since

You have a source for any of your assumptions?

And 40% didn’t think it was important enough to even vote

Okay, so start boycotting Amazon now and don’t stop.