• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Patriotism is pride in your country.

    Nationalism is not knowing the difference between your government and your mommy.

  • Clot@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Nationalism is only good when people are fighting colonialism, e.g. palestine or british era India.

  • wampus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Strange semi related old person story – back in highschool, one of our teachers had the class write essays on whether nationalism was good or bad. We were then given an option to either present our papers, or do a debate exercise with a kind of round robin pro or con. So you’d partner with 1 other person, debate if it was good or bad, then groups of 4 doing the same, until it was the whole class. In my paper and in my discussions, I had used a similar approach as this comic – basically just establishing what nationalism was vs patriotism, and drawing nazi’s in as an example too. No one in those discussions contested that Nazi’s were nationalists – but they still argued in favour of it.

    By the end, I was the only person who thought nationalism was overall ‘bad’. The tide had turned in the groups of 8 stage. Because a hot girl had declared her support for nationalism. That’s all it took for people to like/excuse nazis, even back in the early 2000s. An excuse.

  • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If your whole identity is based on the fact you where born at some location on this planet, you really need some self reflection and deprogramming

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is bullshit.

    Even if the technical definition of “patriotism” is all of these good things, it doesn’t matter because everyone thinks it means all of those bad things.

    • breecher@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, people try to push this patrotism = good, nationalism = bad thing, but it is meaningless, because patriotism has long since become what Reinhart Koselleck would call a “Grundbegriffe”, basically a universal term which everybody has accepted is good, but which everybody interprets and uses in a variety of different (and clashing) interpretations. It is a term you use to invoke that you are on the right side, regardless of what side you are on, because it just means “good”.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Additionally, overt patriotism is usually nationalism.

        Looking at this meme in the first panel, pride in who you are eventually becomes pride in who you aren’t if you feel it strongly enough.

    • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The word “Republican” actually comes from is used today as a decolonial form of Nationalist movement, and they are usually Socialists. Elsewhere in the world, “Republican” still means something actually useful for human goddamn dignity. Since nobody sold out the premise like an American Colonizer party.

      You gonna tell an Irish Nationalist that they can’t celebrate or defend their people even as “Unionist” Pogroms ravage Catholic parts of Northern Ireland?

      You gonna tell an Indigenous Nationalist that their people can’t have the land granted to them by treaties or stand for their people’s sovereign water supply?

      You gonna tell a Jewish Nationalist that they can’t be Anti-Zionist, and build their idea of the Jewish Nation and its Diasporic people on standing up against oppression?

      These illiterate, domesticated-ass liberals still think “nation = country = state”, like this is 2nd grade. The closest they get to reading is a twitter post, my essaying protects me from their eyes. And they want to talk about what Nationalism is.

      Meanwhile Patriotism? Is bipartisan. And it is Stan-ing for a State even as it commits a Genocide. Fuck all of that, and fuck your state. May Trump’s incompetence burn the US’s ability to inflict violence upon the rest of the world.

      • breecher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        he word “Republican” actually comes from a decolonial form of Nationalist movement, and they are always the Left party. Elsewhere in the world, “Republican” still means something actually useful for human goddamn dignity. Since nobody sold out the premise.

        It has nothing to do with that at all. They are called Republicans for historical reasons, but the name has long since lost all relevance to any specific policies, it is just a name for a sports political team. Other political parties in other places are called Republicans for other localised reasons.

        Republic stems from the Roman res publica, but in modern political science it just means a state where the office of head of state isn’t hereditary, ie. basically not a monarchy. This was a key factor in the 18th century, since most European (and globally as well) states were monarchies, so being a republic did mean a drastic change in political system compared to the norm. Not so much anymore, since most states in the world are republics, but they have very drastically different political systems, some are dictatorships others democracies.

        • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, thanks for the correction. Modern Republicanism has a nice Wikipedia page that was worth a perusal.

          The former British Colonies tend to use the word “Republican” in a specifically Anti-British-Monarchy way as that Nation sought independence. This does not apply to the US party.

          Beginning as Socialist Parties is also a notable trend, though not entirely universal among this category. In this, the US party fits the trend well - but has abandoned that principle. Now they want a damn king too. Its disgusting.

      • Bud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The word “republic” comes from res publica. Public thing.

        Indeed, the meaning has been fully distorted, like anything else in the US, and sold to people with no moral, voted by people with no moral.

        • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, fair point.

          The original use? Is not how any single Republican Party I can find actually started. Instead it explicitly Anti-Monarchist, even Socialist Decolonialism for former British Colonies. Even the US party began along these lines - but ya know, the whole selling out thing.

          Tell an Irish Republican you voted for Trump. I dare you.

  • Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Both are tribalism of different levels of intensity. Our brains are predisposed for us-them mentality, some stronger than others, some can leave it behind others never will. It’s also the most exploitable feeling in the history of our species, with fear may be the close contender.

    Obviously a government embracing tribalism leads to horrid shit (everyone without an armband knows it) BUT ignoring it completely allows something else snake its way into that void. If you’re lucky its something vegetarian like football hooliganism, if you-re not – pan-nationalism, religious zealotry, whatever the 4chan incel shit is, people who can’t or won’t leave tribal mentality will find a dirt to roll in.

    IMHO it is worth considering implementing a civic religion a-la french republicanism. Yes it can be a gateway to nationalism, but it also lets tribal minded people wave their flags and “guard the civic values” or whatever while the rest of us continue our lives in peace. As a bonus it improves civic participation and if you’re attacked – well there’s already something for you to rally around.

  • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Office meme, they’re the same picture. The world no longer needs people who are willing to die for, or equally kill for, their country

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Yes, but climate change, water wars and possibly a fundamental change to world order are likely. One might not get a choice, if they prefer to continue living in freedom and peace.

      Doesn’t mean we need patriots though.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Yes if you can convince everyone in the world of this simultaneously, we’ll end all wars.

      Do you think Vladimir Putin will agree with your sentiment?

  • Spectre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Nobody should be patriotic with the genocidal settler colony that is the USA.