• FundMECFS@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Kind of fucked up but tbf Google does similarly shady stuff.

    Please just use duckduckgo (or SearX).

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like Microsoft is way more shameless about their shady stuff. They’ve been messing around with impersonating google/chrome for awhile now, they recently had that thing where they would copy all your open chrome tabs, and then when you started your computer it would open edge with all your chrome tabs to trick people into using edge instead.

    • Gregor@gregtech.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I host my own SearXNG instance, which miiiight be a bit of a bad idea because the anonymity of the crowd disappears but hosting your own services is way too cool to ignore. It’s at search.gregtech.eu in case anyone wants to use it.

      • nef@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is nothing like GregTech! Where’s the tedious microcrafting to enjoy before every search?

      • moe93@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        How did you change the logo? I tried to do that on my instance and failed miserably. Running it through docker.

        • Gregor@gregtech.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          You gotta mount the image to the place where searxng accesses it, like this in docker compose:

          volumes:
                - ./searxng:/etc/searxng:rw
                - type: bind
                  source: ./images/searxng.png
                  target: /usr/local/searxng/searx/static/themes/simple/img/searxng.png
          
          
      • kratoz29@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        What I don’t like about SearXNG (aside of no favicons/icons I think) is that it doesn’t show the content of what I am looking for in the browser desktop tabs, if I search for “Linux” in the tab it is only shown “SearXNG” instead of what I am searching for… That definitely kills my browsing habits… I hope I am being clear (can’t post a screenshot right now), also unsure if it was the same with mobile browsers.

  • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Microsoft does so many scammy things when it comes to trying to prevent people from using Chrome/Google. Even though Edge/Bing hasn’t caught on, I really think them abusing windows dominate OS position this way should be enough for an antitrust lawsuit.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Not just Google. There was a performance “bug” in Windows Defender a while back that specifically harmed Firefox. It had been reported but Microsoft took 5+ years to fix, and Mozilla did the bulk of the sleuthing and proposing fixes themselves.

      Now, whether MS were intentionally crippling a competitor’s browser in the beginning when the bug surfaced (which coincidentally was around the time Edge was relaunched as a chromium browser), there’s no way to know.

      But after a certain point, a software company with a market cap in the trillions loses any benefit of doubt I’d give them in scenarios like this where it benefits them not to find a solution. And 5 years is far beyond that point.

      Unfortunately for Firefox, they didn’t really have the money for a lawsuit against a juggernaut like Microsoft.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is a genius move to keep you from Google search

    Seems more like a genius move to get slapped with another antitrust-like lawsuit.

    • Feelfold@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Corps don’t give a fuck about an antitrust law suit. In the US, the party that pays the most to jerk off CEOs just got put in charge. Even if it was the other party, who only pays slightly less, the most extreme fines are a slap on the wrist. Hell, come Jam 20th it’ll probably a tax write off.

      Until the EU levies fines that would kneecap these companies out of business, there is no incentive to change the behavior.

    • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I mean the original lawsuit was for aggressively bundling Internet Explorer and kneecapping other browsers. Which sure sounds a lot like a minor variation on what they’ve been doing with Edge and Bing for a while now, without consequences. Antitrust enforcement is not something I have a lot of confidence in for the foreseeable future.

  • seven_phone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a search engine showing open evidence of skewing results away from true for their own motivations. Slightly comic when it is Microsoft doing it to Google but if they do this so blatantly how else are they more subtly redirecting our searches towards biased or even false results that benefit them and misinform the user.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    With Net Neutrality gone, these giant tech companies could start bidding to make ISPs make their search engine default and have the other competitors fail to load.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The stupidest thing about this whole entire thing about net neutrality.

      The entire reason the FCC was created was to prevent the committee from being governed by the government process to avoid corruption for the exact circumstances we’re seeing here

      Saying that the Supreme Court and the appeals court has any area of saying what the FCC is legally allowed to do is laughable, as the entire reason for the committee being isolated from the standard Executive Administrative branches was to prevent government overreach like they’re doing currently.

      This is 1,000% them saying hey you’re an isolated committee that we can’t touch but you’re not allowed to do the one thing that your committee is supposed to do

      Corruption all the way to the top. It’s the American way, ironically I think the slogan “drain the swamp” works for both parties, as it’s clear that the people that are in charge aren’t willing to actually uphold the commitment they’ve made to the people.

  • jaxiiruff@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Microsoft is a pathetic little husk of a company, what a corny and predatory practice that not even google cares to do if you search other search engines.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And just when I thought their endless begging couldn’t get any more pathetic.
    Soon enough they’ll tell you a puppy dies every time you launch a non-edge browser

  • BangCrash@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The single thing Google did right when they first came out was a clean UI with a search bar on an uncluttered page.

    At the time the competitors had search pages cluttered with ads and news. It was so bad you couldn’t think.

    If Microsoft makes their search nice to look at them it’s going to get many more users

  • Rinox@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Wait, is Microsoft using Google’s copyrighted work on their page without authorization? This is going to get pulled so fast they’re gonna get whiplash.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Why would they? They can imitate Google’s style w/o violating their copyright, it would actually be easier to reinvent the wheel than to try to somehow copy what Google has. It’s nothing special, just a bit of padding and margin settings for result cards and whatnot.