• Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      They’re saying that any claim to a right to self-defense doesn’t apply here because Israel isn’t defending itself. Precisely because it’s the occupying force who’s committing genocide.

      If Israel WERE under attack, it would obviously have the right to defend itself. But that doesn’t matter here.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Read the article. Even if it was truly under attack, it wouldn’t have the right to engage in military action like, say, Ukraine is against Russia. It has the right to engage in counterinsurgency after guaranteeing the basic rights of the population of Gaza. Cutting off food, water or electricity is obviously a no-go, and generally they don’t get to justify actions by “military advantages”. The limits are a lot more stringent and they’re not even pretending to meet them.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I have to admit, my mental capacity doesn’t do long articles today. That’s on me.

          But yes, what they’re doing is not defending themselves. Is what I said (I think). I feel like we’re somehow talking past each other when we’re saying the same thing.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        It can claim self defense against STATES. Bernie specifically calls Hamas a “terrorist organisation” which he says Israel has the right to defend itself against. This is a lie.

        Francesca Albanese perfectly explains why Israel does not have the right to self defense in this video

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Mate (genderneutral). We’re saying the same thing. A right to self defence exists in principle but it does not apply in case of Israel’s war on Palestine. The right to self defence is besides the point. We’re in agreement.

            • Lumidaub@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Not if in context it is obvious he’s replying to the claim and saying how it doesn’t apply. You cannot reply to a claim without repeating it in some form.

            • OmegaMan@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Not directed at me but I’d like to add: Bernie is a politician trying to change minds. If he DIDN’T include that phrase or (worse) said they didn’t have the right, so so so so so many Americans would completely dismiss anything he had to say. Granted, many still will because of the socialist and Democrat label. Politics are very divided here and he’s trying to reach out to the other side.

              He is on the side of the Palestinians. He has spoken out against this genocide many times. He wants to end the bloodshed.

              • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 days ago

                Bernie is trying to change Liberals minds to support Israel and brainwash them into believe Israel has a right to self-defense. It appears to be working quite well.

                Nobody wants to hear Hasbara disclaimers in front of speeches about Israel committing war crimes. Bernie needs to stop both-sidesing a genocide.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      A lot of borders were rewritten as a consequence of wars throughout history. The initial Israel land was given to them by the victors of WW2. It’s legitimate. Get over it.

      Their actions since to slowly and inhumanely drive out Palestinians in order to occupy more land for themselves are not.

      Israel does have the right to defend itself, as any current country or region looking to protect itself. Their aggression beyond that self-defense is what should be stopped and punished.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Their actions since to slowly and inhumanely drive out Palestinians in order to occupy more land for themselves are not.

        “slowly” you do realize the first thing Israel did upon their founding was the Nakba right?

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Had that worked for them them, we wouldn’t be here today discussing current day genocides. So yes, “slowly”.

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            “Why did the Nazis invade Russia when they already conquered Poland?”

            Because (drum roll please)

            They are Nazis.

            • lath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yeah, I don’t get it. Nazis were set on European domination so of course they would have attacked Russia. Russia would have invaded them as well had the situation been reversed because they shared those ambitions, so I’m not seeing the point you’re trying to make.