• Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    They’re saying that any claim to a right to self-defense doesn’t apply here because Israel isn’t defending itself. Precisely because it’s the occupying force who’s committing genocide.

    If Israel WERE under attack, it would obviously have the right to defend itself. But that doesn’t matter here.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Read the article. Even if it was truly under attack, it wouldn’t have the right to engage in military action like, say, Ukraine is against Russia. It has the right to engage in counterinsurgency after guaranteeing the basic rights of the population of Gaza. Cutting off food, water or electricity is obviously a no-go, and generally they don’t get to justify actions by “military advantages”. The limits are a lot more stringent and they’re not even pretending to meet them.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        I have to admit, my mental capacity doesn’t do long articles today. That’s on me.

        But yes, what they’re doing is not defending themselves. Is what I said (I think). I feel like we’re somehow talking past each other when we’re saying the same thing.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It can claim self defense against STATES. Bernie specifically calls Hamas a “terrorist organisation” which he says Israel has the right to defend itself against. This is a lie.

      Francesca Albanese perfectly explains why Israel does not have the right to self defense in this video

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Mate (genderneutral). We’re saying the same thing. A right to self defence exists in principle but it does not apply in case of Israel’s war on Palestine. The right to self defence is besides the point. We’re in agreement.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Not if in context it is obvious he’s replying to the claim and saying how it doesn’t apply. You cannot reply to a claim without repeating it in some form.

          • OmegaMan@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Not directed at me but I’d like to add: Bernie is a politician trying to change minds. If he DIDN’T include that phrase or (worse) said they didn’t have the right, so so so so so many Americans would completely dismiss anything he had to say. Granted, many still will because of the socialist and Democrat label. Politics are very divided here and he’s trying to reach out to the other side.

            He is on the side of the Palestinians. He has spoken out against this genocide many times. He wants to end the bloodshed.

            • IndustryStandard@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 days ago

              Bernie is trying to change Liberals minds to support Israel and brainwash them into believe Israel has a right to self-defense. It appears to be working quite well.

              Nobody wants to hear Hasbara disclaimers in front of speeches about Israel committing war crimes. Bernie needs to stop both-sidesing a genocide.