It’s weird. The simple fact of being watched and told what you can say. And the possibility that what you’re saying is being edited and what you’re hearing is edited too.

This strikes me as abhorrent. But most of the people here call it necessary, preferable and even desirable.

  • NigahigaYT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    FWIW the Panopticon has been used metaphorically before.

    From Wikipedia (I’d recommend reading the whole Criticisms and use as Metaphor section):

    In the mid-1970s, the panopticon was brought to the wider attention by the French psychoanalyst Jacques-Alain Miller and the French philosopher Michel Foucault.[30] In 1975, Foucault used the panopticon as metaphor for the modern disciplinary society in Discipline and Punish. He argued that the disciplinary society had emerged in the 18th century and that discipline are techniques for assuring the ordering of human complexities, with the ultimate aim of docility and utility in the system.[31] Foucault first came across the panopticon architecture when he studied the origins of clinical medicine and hospital architecture in the second half of the 18th century. He argued that discipline had replaced the pre-modern society of kings, and that the panopticon should not be understood as a building, but as a mechanism of power and a diagram of political technology

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Fair.

      It does make for a much more compelling allegory for society, as much like prison, it’s really hard to “exit” society.

      While opting out of moderated social media is not difficult at all.