• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    So much fucking wrong with this story!

    80-year-old behind the wheel.

    Driving a truck too fucking big to see kids.

    Hits a child then tries to get away.

    Charged only with manslaughter.

    Parents of the dead child forgive him, saying they don’t want severe consequences for the guy who killed their son and attempted to get away with murder.

    Fuck this whole thing. All of it.

    • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 days ago

      The guy was charged with leaving the scene. Would have liked the phrase “hit and run” somewere in the artical as that’s what happened.

      George Parker Hunter, of Cedar Hills, was charged Friday in 4th District Court with manslaughter, a second-degree felony, and leaving the scene of an accident involving death, a third-degree felony.>

      Also can he be charged with lieing to an officer? He definitely is covering his tracks but badly.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      America in a nutshell…

      Old people murdering children with a nothing burger consequence

      Social security queen did nothing wrong besides living his best life. 🤡

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Maybe as a trade, we could leave it at manslaughter if the same charge is applied to the designers of big-grill pickup trucks and SUVs.

    • Cocopanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      An old guy in a truck ran over a dude at my work who was laying down and doing something at the gas station. Told the dude to sue the insurance for millions.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Charged only with manslaughter.

      Article mentions other charges, presumable you mean, “charged with nothing harsher than manslaughter.” What charge do you think is appropriate for an unintentional homicide while doing non-criminal activities?

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        presumable you mean, “charged with nothing harsher than manslaughter.” What charge do you think is appropriate for an unintentional homicide while doing non-criminal activities?

        Friend, read the article.

        Prosecutors say at least two witnesses “were honking, yelling, and waving” at Hunter to get him to stop. Instead, Hunter allegedly “began to pick up speed and left the scene.”

        Dalton was dragged about 50 feet before becoming dislodged from the vehicle.

        Not only is manslaughter inappropriate for a hit-and-run, but him dragging the body without intention to stop suggests he may have killed this boy as he was trying to run away.

        If an upgraded charge can’t be done in this case, then we need to make a new charge for future hit-and-run drivers.

        • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Having a friend who’s life was derailed for years after being dragged under a van for a block, I’m guessing he didn’t even notice. Just straight-up oblivious. The driver who right hooked my buddy and dragged him, as far as anyone could tell, was completely unaware of what had happened. And an Ecoline is both smaller than and has better visibility that one of these modern bloater trucks.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m guessing he didn’t even notice. Just straight-up oblivious. The driver who right hooked my buddy and dragged him, as far as anyone could tell, was completely unaware of what had happened.

            As terrible as that must have been, the driver could very well argue ignorance (they should still be in deep shit for it, though).

            But in this case, the driver was being hailed by multiple witnesses who were trying to stop him from leaving the scene, and he fled faster!

            He might claim negligence for the initial hit, but not for the rest of it.

            • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Right but my point is that in that raised climate controlled soundproofed cab he might legitimately not heard shit. Not that it should be an excuse, but an American judge would probably disagree with me on that. Old fart’s got his culpable deniability.

              • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                That’s what licencing is for.

                You assume that licence drivers understand the limitations and risks of the vehicle they are in.

                You assume that they would drive slowly and/or with a window down if they can’t see/hear well enough to avoid hitting things in a residential area.

                Not this

                “I knew I hit a bicycle, but I didn’t think there was a kid on it,” Hunter said, according to the charges.

                • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  lol no I don’t assume any of that and it’s kinda weird how often people on lemmy are telling me what I assume

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          So, fleeing from the scene, failing to render aid, etc etc etc, but it doesn’t turn an unintentional act into premeditated homicide. You can agree to that, right?

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            That’s why I said there should be a new, elevated charge available in these cases.

            FWIW, there are circumstances where a charge is automatically elevated, even if not premeditated, so we know that laws can have flexibility.

            For example:

            While planning and deliberation is the key [for a 1st degree murder charge], there are circumstances where it is not necessary for a conviction. For example, a man was charged with first-degree murder in 2011 after a police officer was run over and killed by a stolen snowplow. While there was no proof that there was a plan to use the plow to kill someone, the death occurred while the police officer was performing his duties, thus leading to a first-degree charge. SOURCE

            I’m not saying drivers who do hit-and-runs should get 1st degree murder, but they should get something more than that.

            If this happened in Canada, the driver could get life in prison. But Florida looks at hit-and-run as a third-degree felony, which is equal to something like forgery or theft over $750. 🫤

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I do think “fleeing a crime scene” and “destroying evidence” would be mentionable. The real problem though is 80 yr olds shouldn’t be driving cars or trucks.

        Its so depressing that we force 80 year olds to drive cars instead of giving people alternative transportation.

  • hypnotoad@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    14 days ago

    Man these parents are… Different than I

    I cannot imagine forgiving some fuck that ran over my kid and dragged them for 50 feet while speeding away from the waving/honking bystanders, certain shit is just unforgivable

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Right they have to restrain me from not killing that man. Fucking dumbass parents. I would burn the whole system down if this happened to my child. Fucking 80 year olds shouldn’t be behind the wheel. Unless they pass a driving test every 6 months.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Forgiveness benefits oneself more than it benefits the subject. This is a very hard lesson that most people never learn. Refusing to forgive feels like a duty, or a burden. Like when we refuse to heal after a tragedy, it feels like our duty to be wounded forever. Forgiveness is how you move through that, allowing your own life to move forward.

    • 5too@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Not sure I would either, but I can at least understand that some people don’t want the emotional load of anger.

      Still, why aren’t they at least trying to make sure this guy stays off the road?!

  • Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    Honest question: I thought that Florida had that law where any death that occurs as part of a crime being committed is considered first degree murder. Is that not the case or is there a loophole that excludes drivers?

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Cedar Hills man, 80

    Old man should never be behind the fucking wheel.

    And the really dumb parents are just as culpable by forgiving… wtf, that’s actually homicide.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      You can disagree with the parents all you want but acting like that makes them culpable is psychotic

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 days ago

    There’s so many posts in this community that shouldn’t be here.

    This community should be about how overall use of cars, as they’re used normally, just by design hurts the world.

    There’s a recent story where trump wants to build new roads through forests. Cars don’t need to be there. THAT is a fuck cars story.

    Showing car dominant society being linked to an increase in cancer. THAT is a fuck cars story.

    Showing links between walkable communities, and increase in personal happyness. THAT is a fuck cars story.

    But these stories that overwhelm this community seems to be “guy drives car, runs over people, fuck cars”

    And to me, thats more of a fuck humans story. I’m very much a fuck cars guy. But this story? The vehicle is not the villain here.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I want to know which Chevy truck this is and what viewing angles it has. If it’s one of the newer ones where the grill goes above 5 feet, yeah fuck the car and the human driving it.