• Badabinski@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There was a huge kerfuffle about it here when it happened. We had a law on the books that allowed it and the dude insisted on it, ostensibly for religious reasons. I can’t remember if we took the law off the books or not, but I hope we did. While nobody else knows who fired the killing shots, the people who did it know. If they’re the type that wants to kill, then I don’t want to give them the pleasure. If they’re not, I don’t want to make those people live with a violent death on their conscience. It’s fucked up, just like executions in general.

      EDIT: Execution by firing squad had been removed in 2004, but anyone sentenced before then had it as an option. Gardner was grandfathered in.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Based on what I’ve read it seems like a firing squad is actually more humane than using drugs

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        True.

        Although I wonder if it creates jailers who have to work extra hard to dehumanize people. So that’s probably not great.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      States are having a hard time getting access to lethal injection drugs. Also having a hard time finding qualified people to do the injections properly.

      IIRC they reauthorised firing squads was due to the effective nature and readily available qualified personnel.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sounds like a pretty good way to go to be honest. It’ll all be over in seconds instead of the minutes to hours of lethal injection.