• Cocopanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I work for a controller OEM that builds the brains for managing these systems. It’s cutting edge stuff.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The part that controls/balances the discharge profiles, right? Because sodium batteries have a more non-linear discharge pattern.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is big! Grid scale Sodium Ion battery technology is (on paper) the best candidate for cheap large scale electricity storage. The fact that this company is working on 9 pilot deployments mean that this will likely produce the real world results that the paper exercises promise.

    There are SO MANY advantages of Sodium Ion battery tech for grid storage over everything else we’ve used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

    Sodium Ion batteries:

    • don’t have as intense thermal management needs Lithium chemistries
    • don’t have the massive negative environmental impact for their source materials (because its a part of regular old table/sea salt)
    • doesn’t have the massive swings in capacity when operated in extreme hot or cold temperatures. Sodium Ion doesn’t care.

    The only downsides to Sodium Ion is that the batteries are physically larger for the same amount of energy stored (which isn’t a problem for stationary storage), and the charging/discharging curves are not as linear as other chemistries (which again, isn’t an issue because these are purpose built applications where the curves can easily be managed by battery management systems).

    • yaroto98@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I would happily dedicate a corner of my garage for a big sodium ion battery.

      Also, fun fact they can charge and discharge faster than lithium ion. Also, their chemistry doesn’t lead to spontaneous combustion. Perfect for a house backup.

      • bryndos@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think it’s the fire thing that is really their killer feature. So to speak.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I love this too, I just hope they don’t use too much Phosphorous, because those reserves are limited too, maybe there are alternative designs once this gets going.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Would container ships be a good application? Or too heavy/large?

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m really excited about na-ion, if commercial BMS circuitry was available I would already have some for a few home automation and sensing projects because of their low temp performance alone. But I’ll have to spin up a custom implementation with an arduino or something and I don’t have that kind of skills lol.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      everything else we’ve used so far (nearly all Lithium based).

      We have used water before lithium, and it isn’t bad at all.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        We have used water before lithium, and it isn’t bad at all.

        Not so great in a flat dry desert though. Pump storage is great when there is lots of water and a naturally occurring elevation, but there’s lots of places on Earth that don’t have that, but do have energy to store.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Middle-East involves plenty of mountainous areas, and the reason many of those are arid is because water, ahem, flows down.

              Also in a flat dry desert one can replace pumping water up with raising heavy things up. I think. More wear though.

            • naeap@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Not sure why you’re getting down voted, as you’re sadly correct here

              Still better then many alternatives, but it’s not as environmental friendly as it’s advertised

    • Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Finally something the EU can invest those 600 billion in. Or buy it, like lots of EU startups were by FAANG companies years ago. Tramp says it’s dead tech, so it’s ok.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I honestly dont care who develops these kind of technologies, because it will spread.

        The impact of these products are too important.

  • Womble@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    It would be nice to see a price/GWh of this (along with running costs, it says they save 1 Million per GWh, how much were the running costs before!?), but any improvement in battery tech is definitely a good thing.