Is it not obvious that this is the first half of a sentence and has been selectively edited to mislead?
I don’t have video of the Montana rally, but Sanders has talked about this issue repeatedly at the Fight Oligarchy rallies, and here is what he said in LA:
“Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorism, but it does not have a right to go to war against the entire Palestinian people… to kill 50,000 people, injure over 100,000 and destroy the entire infrastructure.”
“And as bad as that is, Trump wants to expel the 2.2 million people in Gaza in order to create a playground for his billionaire friends,” Sanders added, referring to Trump’s proposal to “take ownership” of the Gaza strip. “That is beyond insane, and we will never, never let that happen.”
Certainly, there are many who disagree with this half of the sentence, and that’s fine, but it should at least be presented with context.
It is about the Hasbara talking point “Israel had the right to defend itself.” Nothing else. Bernie needs to stop inserting Hasbara disclaimers to both sides a genocide.
You’re so fucking insane with this talking point bullshit. What bernie said is a sentence that stands alone, not everyone is some loser slurping media 24/7 and declaring literal fucking plain english as some uniquely constructed sentence with an exact connotation.
“Israel has the right to defend itself” is the number one excuse used by Israel to commit genocide and the catchphrase Zionists insert in front of every single crime.
The video is a selective edit of a whole sentence that has been manipulated to make a popular politician say something despicable. If you add in the second half of his sentence then we can have an honest discussion. Until then, you have selectively edited the truth to spread a lie.
Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?
Is it not obvious that this is the first half of a sentence and has been selectively edited to mislead?
I don’t have video of the Montana rally, but Sanders has talked about this issue repeatedly at the Fight Oligarchy rallies, and here is what he said in LA:
Certainly, there are many who disagree with this half of the sentence, and that’s fine, but it should at least be presented with context.
Here is a link to the Montana Rally. The Israel statement begins at 1:19:00 for context.
Removed by mod
The correct response is to report as misinformation, not merely to block.
sticking your head in the sand when it comes to reality is the reason why we have trump in office.
Removed by mod
Democrats unwillingness to listen to their fellow Democrats costed the last election and will cost others
It is about the Hasbara talking point “Israel had the right to defend itself.” Nothing else. Bernie needs to stop inserting Hasbara disclaimers to both sides a genocide.
You’re so fucking insane with this talking point bullshit. What bernie said is a sentence that stands alone, not everyone is some loser slurping media 24/7 and declaring literal fucking plain english as some uniquely constructed sentence with an exact connotation.
Attack the idea and not the person.
“Israel has the right to defend itself” is the number one excuse used by Israel to commit genocide and the catchphrase Zionists insert in front of every single crime.
You should ask yourself why the UN rapporteur specifically addressed this point. https://youtube.com/shorts/ApnKGxawGfE
Person: “My opponent said ‘X’. Here’s why ‘X’ is wrong.”
You: “You need to stop saying X, Person!”
Person: ignores argument and tries to talk about something else
You: “We need change the topic because you are right but this post is inconvenient to my narrative”
I’m sorry, I actually can’t follow. Who ignored what argument? Where did I change the topic from what to what?
Go watch the video I linked first.
The video is a selective edit of a whole sentence that has been manipulated to make a popular politician say something despicable. If you add in the second half of his sentence then we can have an honest discussion. Until then, you have selectively edited the truth to spread a lie.
Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?