Ah, of course, I was looking at the English Wikipedia article. Still, the Swedish article mentions Les Bronzés, no?

Which article is this?

Well, you still managed to check it, no?

I just checked the articles for “Sällskapsresan” and “French Fried Vacation”. The only edit that was reverted (or at least the only edit whose author would’ve been notified by the revert) changed “Norwegian” to “German” on the former page. I also didn’t find “is on DVD for exceptionally cheap” anywhere. None of these articles are protected (i.e. “locked”) either. Which article did this happen on?

You can ask me about sources. We probably all know what “reliable” means, and claims may cite any reliable source (even sources written by the subject of the article if the fact is uncontroversial). However, for an article to be included in Wikipedia, and mainly so that it’s possible for the article to be improved so that it conforms with Wikipedia’s guidelines, articles must pass “notability” (a misnomer, see efforts to change its name); the biggest component of notability that’s most often failed is that there is enough coverage in reliable sources not written by the subject, and that’s precisely so that we won’t have an article that’s entirely the subject’s own puffery that turns out to be false or egregiously biased. (Not an admin because I probably have too short a temper, but nonetheless experienced.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Scam_warning

What does the article mean “Juniper Networks, despite being a “Good Article”, is also mostly PR”? It seems like a fine article to me, and as the article mentioned, Tinucherian disclosed his COI and appropriately sought review for edits in this case (though as the article also mentions, he’s edited other articles the wrong way).

This. This is the way. Even if the APY is just 4% I get 40k free.

During reconstruction and until Jim Crow, the Republicans had a base in the South. And limited government and regulation isn’t a geographical belief but flipped between the two parties anyways, even before the Southern strategy, as we can see in the 20s. Northern Democratic Party was always a thing, and in fact its splitting of the vote against Southern Democrats was one of the reasons Lincoln won his first election.

Stating it was his intent would draw attention away from so much more of the focus on Trump’s havoc. “his speech technically isn’t a filibuster because they’re debating a confirmation” doesn’t sound like “it’s coincidental” to me.

no the real verse is just fantasizing about having sex with some conservative anchor

https://undelete.pullpush.io/r/appers/comments/83j49o/new_conservative_rap_idea

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

deleted by creator

Immediately following the speech, deliberations on Matthew Whitaker’s nomination to serve as ambassador of NATO resumed on the Senate floor, resulting in the Senate confirming his nomination later that evening 52–45.[25] However, Booker’s speech was not technically a filibuster to prevent a piece of legislation from passing.[16]

Depending on how long he is able to go, he could disrupt Senate business on Tuesday, though his speech technically isn’t a filibuster — the chamber is currently in a limited period of debate time for Matthew Whitaker’s nomination as ambassador to NATO. — https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/03/31/congress/cory-booker-talk-a-thon-00262482

how so? they were in the middle of the whittaker nomination.

could you elaborate? was he not blocking the confirmation?

He was blocking Trump’s confirmation of the ambassador to NATO, but yeah, we should’ve had it during the budget vote.

which organization are we going to?

bike time

oh yeah I also have LeaF—Wizdomiot which is certainly not classical/baroque as it’s medieval-feel but it is orchestral + hardcore. There’s also a banger extended version (called the long ver.) but Optie Animation makes good BGAs (term for a music video for rhythm game music).

The Chinese release of the Switch has like 18 games in total