cm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agoAstronomy Factslemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up1297arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1293arrow-down1external-linkAstronomy Factslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square12fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZloubida@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoIt’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
minus-squareJolteon@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoIn order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.
minus-squareTabbsTheBat@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agohttps://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
minus-squarebstix@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThe Milky Way is visible. It’s estimated that approximately 6 new stars are formed in the Milky every year.
minus-squareOrganicMustard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoThere are still stars forming, so probably yes if you use a super telescope
It’s all relative in space 😅. But I could reformulate my question: are visible today in our night sky stars that weren’t visible less than 100 years ago?
In order for the stars to actually be less than 100 years old, they would also need to be with a hundred light years of us.
https://www.space.com/astronomers-new-star-nova-explosion-t-coronae-borealis
Not exactly the question, but while looking into it I found this :3 a star visible once every 80 years
The Milky Way is visible. It’s estimated that approximately 6 new stars are formed in the Milky every year.
There are still stars forming, so probably yes if you use a super telescope