return2ozma@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 days agoProletariat shopping time...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1484arrow-down112
arrow-up1472arrow-down1imageProletariat shopping time...lemmy.worldreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down4·2 days agoOh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.
minus-squaresomethingsnappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 days agoIt would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·edit-22 days ago but that was a government takeover. How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure takeover would happen? an angry mob?
minus-squaresomethingsnappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoDid you read the post?
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 day agoIt was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn’t mean there was any significant change.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoThe post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.
Oh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.
It would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.
How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure takeover would happen? an angry mob?
Did you read the post?
It was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn’t mean there was any significant change.
The post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.