• besselj@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Notice how they say nothing about taking responsibility for robotaxi deaths when they happen.

      • besselj@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Perhaps accountability is a better word to use. Where in the 3rd and 4th paragraphs? I don’t have access to Archive on my VPN rn, but nowhere in the linked article do they talk about holding companies that control and own robots to the same level of accountability as an individual.

        The most interesting part of the interview arrived when Korosec brought on a thought experiment. What if self-driving vehicles like Waymo and others reduce the number of traffic fatalities in the United States, but a self-driving vehicle does eventually cause a fatal crash, Korosec pondered. Or as she put it to the executive: “Will society accept that? Will society accept a death potentially caused by a robot?”

        “I think that society will,” Mawakana answered, slowly, before positioning the question as an industrywide issue. “I think the challenge for us is making sure that society has a high enough bar on safety that companies are held to.”

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          We’re already accepting an alphabet agency adjacent mobile surveillance unit so…