Well not really, cuz the conservatives want them to be toll roads. Built with public funds for private profit though, that’s always fun.
Well not really, cuz the conservatives want them to be toll roads. Built with public funds for private profit though, that’s always fun.
The evil Jewish space laser starting forest fire lady doesn’t hate Jews? You sure?
The concept of absolute monarchies wasn’t really that well established 500 years ago. It was just really in it’s earliest phases. What’s usually called the age of absolutism doesn’t start till the early 17th century.
Man I wish I knew what that was like
How do you define average? Cuz when you include the whole planet, that’s below most people on this website current living standards.
Looks more like two big enchiladas
You can’t. Ever.
I was not asking for advice. You are not giving me new ideas.
I tell you I feel this comment. Sums up my experience with Lemmy perfectly. Just unending unasked for advice. This whole website is basically made up of old guys at a bowling alley who try to teach everybody how to bowl against their will.
I’d argue the publicly owned ones are actually the bigger problems. At least with privately owned ones there’s usually a single individual or small group of individuals that can be influenced threatened and held accountable, or what passes for accountability these days. With publicly own companies though there’s this concept of the nebulous shareholder. There’s such a wide range of people who own the shares of the company that they are untouchable yet at the same time completely ignorable. Companies don’t have to answer to the shareholders because the shareholders don’t feel involved enough or care enough to actually speak out. Instead it’s the concept of the shareholder. Which is actually more dangerous. That anonymity makes it a more brutal and ravenous concept. Private companies are able to think more long term because the private owner is able to think long-term, or longer rather, where is publicly owned companies that Anonymous shareholder concept requires constant unending and immediate growth. Which is a cancerous concept. For society and the planet both.
Not that either is good of course, just that one’s more dangerous. Also Nestle is very very evil, publicly owned by the way.
I don’t know if spa day is how I would describe that.
Yeah I haven’t actually seen season three yet, but I have read all the comics and I got to tell you he keeps working with them.
It’s not like they even care what Jesus said either.
Doesn’t Invincible literally work with and for a secret government military organization?
Sounds like a hater ass thing to say to me
He’s still the executive chairman of the board and the largest shareholder. As for dying a billionaire, hopefully sooner rather than later.
It occurs to me maybe she was told to oppose this bill by the leadership because they think if she opposes it people will decide not to join her on opposing it.