• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If I drew a 3 mile circle around my house, I’d have to cross three numbered highways with no sidewalks or crosswalks to reach the edge in any direction. The US was built with cars in mind, and it fucking sucks.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, that’s the issue with a lot of car centric city, highway cutting across neighbourhoods which makes some 1km travel impossible because of the highway.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is 2021 a good year to study? Not only is this during the pandemic, but it was early when people were still taking the pandemic seriously.

  • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fir anyone else curious: they used anonymous mobile device location data, so the only know distance traveled and time stayed. They don’t know which specific mode of transportation was used.

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They can use speed to filter for walking / biking as well as if their path stays on the road

      Not perfect, but a really good guestimate

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh, they definitely could, but they didn’t for this study. The way they said they collected information for this one was more focused on “are people changing movement behavior during COVID” so they just looked at start and stop points, distance and dwell time, anonymized to the county level.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I share this study as regularly as it seems reasonable in spaces outside the realm of car free living. While I’ve had some nice exchanges with people that hadn’t given it thought, it does seem to be met with aggravation more often than not.

    Primarily individuals making multiple trips a week more than a hundred kilometres and they don’t want to have to recharge every day. I’ve pointed out they would typically charge at home overnight, but then more edge cases chime in of course. If a person refueled their current car after every trip they made, it would be a quick resolve in opinion to the benefit of this study. That’s exactly what I did once upon a time and I downsized as soon as I could.

    Perhaps understandably, it’s difficult to envision a different way of living for someone that has been unknowingly entrenched in anything, let alone something as dominating as cars are.

  • IllNess@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    A trip was defined as a movement that includes a stay of longer than 10 minutes at a location away from home. Multiple stays of longer than 10 minutes before returning home were counted as multiple trips. The trips included driving, rail, transit, and air.

  • Tower@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s 3.3 miles to my nearest grocery store, and I consider that relatively close. 1 mile is 45 mph, 1 lane, no sidewalks. 2 miles is 45 mph (that people do 55mph), 2 lanes, no sidewalks. The .3 is neighborhood and parking lot.