• turdcollector69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s crazy to think this all could have been avoided if Biden just kept his word and let us have an actual primary where Kamala predicably would have lost early on.

    Instead we got a half assed bait and switch for the worst polling candidate possible. I swear she was picked because she was the cheapest corpo money could buy.

    The DNC needs to be dissolved because they keep picking loser corporate stooges that nobody likes in the belief that they can just AstroTurf and gaslight their way to popularity.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Everyone seems to conveniently forget the fact that the only one that was legally entitled to any of the money raised for Biden’s campaign, over like 3 years of fundraising, was Kamala because she was on the ticket.

      Restarting the fundraising process from scratch, after even just a 14-21 day primary process that would somehow also be built out of nowhere, would have meant whoever secured any nomination would have easily been outspent by a mile. They would have had no funds to even campaign on. It probably would have locked all the money that was already donated up too, considering that it would take quite some time to refund all of that money; figure out who was owed what exactly based on what hadnt been spent yet, etc…

      Like what the fuck else did anyone expect to reasonably happen? It was stupid for Biden to ever say they could even have had a primary. The real promise he should have stuck to was when he claimed he would only be a one term president years beforehand

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      If Biden died rather than step aside who would have been the candidate? It would be Harris as that is who was selected by the states that ran democratic primaries at that point.

      • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Harris is deeply unpopular with anyone who isn’t a rabid neolib and was solely picked by the neolib establishment (read fucking dinosaurs addicted insider trading) for her willingness to be a corporate stooge.

        If she was half as wonderful as the online astroturfing suggested she wouldn’t have had an abysmal turnout and wouldn’t have lost the election along with every primary along the way.

        I knew she was cooked the moment she announced her VP and he got 1,000x the enthusiasm and coverage that she did.

        We needed an actual democratic socialist to excite people, not another fucking Israeli funded Republican-lite campaigning on a desperate gamble to gaslight people into thinking she isn’t just another dogshit neolib.

        • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          She was fairly qualified given that she was VP.

          I feel that Harris was more left leaning than most people say, but she was playing the election too safe by not trying to promise a stronger platform. She was hedging her bets and was preparing to not have a supermajority in the Senate. In doing so though, her messaging was underwhelming.

          If she overpromised and won, then she would have looked exactly the same as Biden. Where nothing meaningful could get passed federally due to being short on votes.

          If she underpromised and somehow won big, then the Democrats would have looked great going into 2026 and 2028.

          Instead, she underpromised and underperformed, the House, Senate, and White House were lost as a result.

          I agree that sticking with a message people can believe in does matter, and it’s why Bernie Sanders is having success even in rural West Virginia in the current year. The progressive platform is popular when people hear about it, so we need an elected leader that believes in the progressive message they are selling.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Kamala had to be carried as VP, she had absolutely no business being the nomination.

            Shit, the only reason she was made VP was because of the identity politics of having yet another ancient white guy in office.

            Sorry I double responded, I meant to reply to another commenter and left it here by accident.

            • frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              38 minutes ago

              I think she came with too much baggage as the nominee unfortunately, some of the reason I think they pushed for her was because she would get access to Biden’s campaign funds. But then she ended up not even needing those, so likely any other Dem could have raised a similar amount given how much everything mattered.

              I believe she was nominated as VP because she had a similar corporate Dem appeal to Biden back in 2020. Although she definitely more left leaning than Biden. Most of the other candidates back then felt much more left leaning than Biden was.

              No worries!

        • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          None of this answered the question I asked though.

          Are you educated in the American political system at all? Im asking this because I don’t know you and a lot of the “they never held a primary” folks are actually not well educated on elections and how they work.

          • mlg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            She would have lost, even by the DNC’s own crappy poll metrics which showed several candidates that were much more popular, like Newsom who could have easily fulfilled his role as a shill and a well received candidate instead of just an obvious shill.

            DNC running around with “too late for a primary” and “can’t adjust voter law” is moot when you consider that almost all of them have a catch all cause for holding primary elections in circumstance, and the fact that they aren’t even tied to the Federal election or even State control if the DNC wishes.

            That all being said, Harris would have been the de facto candidate as the incumbent if Biden died, but if the DNC wanted to, they could easily chose not to run her as the candidate and hold a primary.

            • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Her potential loss might be the case but there is a good reason for why they did not hold a primary after already running one. There’s no legal reason I am aware of that invalidates the races already ran.

          • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Your question isn’t relevant to what actually happened because it’s an entirely different hypothetical situation.

            • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              No, it’s directly relevant as it is the next closest situation as to what happened. Biden stepped down because ge could not fulfill the role due to his health.

              • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                It’s literally not. That’s not what happened and has nothing to do with me talking about how Biden should have let a primary happen. You just brought this up as if it was relevant when it’s really not

                • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Biden stepped aside due to health concerns after a disastrous debate. These concerns have since been justified as Biden has cancer.

                  There was a primary and Biden/Harris won it. They ran unopposed for most of it.

                  • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    Okay, you do realize that Biden should have stepped down long before the debates ever even occurred.

                    Again I reiterate, you’re talking about something completely different than what I’m talking about.