• jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, all those graphs tell very different stories and even if they did, it wouldn’t inherently mean the transition to fiat was the problem.

      • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        people who don’t understand currency crack me up. it’s like pretending the value of specie was tied to the value of precious metal by fiat makes it special.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I get why it’s so hard to understand, economics (even when studied) isn’t really a science and a lot is based in vibes.

          Bitcoin is a fascinating example of a modern day commodity based system. Theoretically there is a finite amount of bitcoin that can exist, meaning there is a limited supply that controls the “market”. And as we can see in the bitcoin market, commodity has its own problems (most notably people don’t really want to spend it).

          There are even some research done in the space, I’m not familiar with the Cato institute, but there write up here seems like a decent explanation of gold vs bitcoin - https://www.cato.org/blog/how-bitcoin-system-unlike-gold-standard

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            IMHO economics has been gradually becoming more of a science since the 1970s. We just haven’t changed monetary policy since then, so crypto is the most isolated petri dish we’ve got.