Then why mention his name at all. It’s just like the covid checks, Trump demands/wants the attention.

With these kinds of models you can’t ever stop training them, otherwise you reach a point where the data becomes dated and thus the model is dated.

Think world events. Say another bird flu became a pandemic. The model can only know about that if it’s trained on those events.

There are systems (Rag) that can answer questions based on additional content, but that would only work on a subset of problems/situations.

Wasn’t claiming it was a good or bad call, just that the Supreme Court is about legality and there is history of the US banning software and a global history of banning this specific app.

I think it’s more there is a precedence of the government blocking software they think is a threat - https://cmmcinfo.org/list-of-hardware-software-and-services-banned-by-us-government/

We give the government a lot of leeway when it comes to “national security”

Also, we’re not the first country to ban it - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/heres-what-happened-when-india-banned-tiktok

Yeah, it’s not particularly interesting or impressive. We’ve been able to do this for years, just in the news cause it plays into a lot of people’s fears about AI.

What? Biden, Kissinger, what year is it?

I don’t know a single person in the US who has unilateral control over anything. Hell, none of the US people mentioned can consistently get anything done.