PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up11.44Karrow-down137
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1external-linkThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-squareSergio@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·2 months agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down1·2 months agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”