• Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Homo sapiens* the s is not for plural.

      But it’s a good thing you clarified that you meant H. sapiens, since there’s a strong argument to be made that earlier Homo species are also human. (And also that battles were had even before the divergence of Homo from Hominini.)

      • MycelialMass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Oops! Thanks for correction!

        Ya I think Homo literally translates to man so H. Erectus, habilis, etc. I think are regarded as humans? Its not my field tbh

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Gee, maybe we can be done with it, since we’ve been doing it so long, and it’s had so many adverse consequences?

      • MycelialMass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Firstly, I dont condone war or violence, I think we are smart enough to resolve issues without it now.

        But generally speaking, there are massive benefits if youre the winner in a conflict. New resources, new land, new labor force (assuming you dont wipe everyone out completely), reinforcement of your culture and ideaologies, and more. Theres a reason violece is inherit to human nature, it has a long history as a viable and successful strategy.