There’s no solution or implementation, and the law in place actually forbids social media from requiring ID as the means of age verification. But who knows what it’ll end up actually looking like, because even the politicians didn’t bother figuring that out before passing the law in under a week.

enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

In practice, there’s no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

Which, incidentally…might be the same thing Trump does to “unban TikTok” once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like…that’s literally not legal for a president to do. They can’t legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

Facebook should not be making content moderation decisions based on machine translations. They should be paying actual humans who can both speak the language and understand the cultural context of the posts. Yes, that’s going to cost them more. They shouldn’t be allowed to operate if they don’t do it.

Calling women property and transgender people mentally ill? We sleep

Post commemorating anti-genocide author who was assassinated thanks to the negligence of the country responsible for said genocide? Real shit

Not really. Wikipedia is not a democracy. It would only take a handful of dedicated zionists to kick up a fuss to create the debate. The fact that it arrived at the right conclusion is a testament to Wikipedia’s editorial policies.