I constantly see that the current US Supreme Court makes inconstitucional rulings like for example, allowing racial profiling.

For what little I’ve gathered due to separation of powers. The supreme court is just a designated authority. Why hasn’t there been any movement that just aims to de-legitimize the current supreme Court?

Why can’t a judge say “I denounce the Supreme courts authority for their failing to uphold the spirit of the law and now I shall follow this other courts rulings”?

      • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I agree, your opinion is very popular.

        edit: especially among professional lawyers…

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Sorry, it’s not an opinion, it’s legal fact established by our founding documents.

          It’s irrelevant how much people “like” it.

          • BussyGyatt@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Don’t judges issue legal opinions? Don’t legal opinions constitute what makes up legal facts (ie not facts about a case, or facts about a person, but facts about what constitutes law)? Did not opinions about what ought to be the law determine what was actually written in the constitution? Hasn’t changing public opinion provoked changes in the constitution with time?

            I agree, the popular appeal of a belief is not relevant to whether that belief is well-founded.