• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I do have some sympathy for this guy, sounds like the cop was being a dickhead.

    However I caught this point in the article:

    Many municipalities are cracking down on volume, which is justified to some extent, but then arguably goes too far when stock vehicles are being cited as nuisances

    Yeah, about that… cars are almost all so obnoxiously loud at all times.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why does something being “stock” excuse it from nuisance laws? Fucking 8 billion lumen headlights, ridiculous exhausts, completely unnecessarily large vehicles, and blasting stereos are the bane of my commute and work day. And people have them for no other reason than because.

      And putting any sort of sound kit on an ev should be a crime. Fucking safety!? Really?

    • toeblast96@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      god whenever im walking down the street and theres no cars for even just 5 seconds, the absolute silence is Amazing

  • SirMaple__@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    5 days ago

    Good lord. One of the main things about EVs that I like is how quiet they are. They could put a noise maker on them for safety reason no problem, but the one on the Charger is way too loud.

    Reminds me of those stupid kits you can get online to make your plain old bike or ebike sound like a motocycle. So stupid.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Ts not just how quiet EVs are, but the combination of massive torque and silence makes acceleration seem effortless. My car will pull away from almost any other car I encounter, just taking it easy, while they wheeze and rattle and whine and struggle to get up to speed.

      I recently had to drive a gasoline car and it was sad how much effort it seemed to be putting into some minor acceleration. I’m starting to think of these vehicles similarly to steam engines or steampunk creations. It’s fascinating how they achieved such complexity back then, all those gears and clanging metal parts, and they’re well suited for a museum

  • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    Unbelievably funny of the article and completely oblivious to make a point about how it’s ELECTRIC AND CAN’T MAKE NOISE U DUMMY COP PERSON but later explain that actually it can definitely make a lot of fucking noise, it was just turned off trust me bro

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    It can also produce a fake engine noise while moving

    That is just so sad. It’s the equivalent of a 5yo kid putting this cardboard piece against the spikes so that when the wheel turns it makes this “flapflapflap” noise to look cool

    It’s the “look, I can STILL be an obnoxious asshole!” mode

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    The Charger EV can “rev” quite loudly, but it has to be put in Park to do that. It can also produce a fake engine noise while moving, but it must be in Sport mode for that. Mike told us he had his car set to the Auto drive mode at the time because he was low on battery, and that setting keeps the synthesized sounds to a minimum.

    Of course he’s going to say that. ACAB but in this case if the cop claims the car was loud that’s all that is needed. You can always put some switch in your car to “change settings to quite” and claim it was on. It’s not for the cop to prove when it was on or off. The car shouldn’t be able to make loud noises at any point. If you have this setting then fuck you.

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      “Acab, but I immediately believe what the cop said with no evidence, even as he tickets someone for a loud muffler that the car literally doesnt have and openly fishes for other violations to try to justify the stop.”

      • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Just cuz they don’t have a new offense name yet for the fratzonic fake super loud exhaust replicator system, doesn’t mean people shouldn’t get in trouble for doing the same dumb stuff they would with a “real” loud exhaust system.

        • rainwall@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I get your point, but ACAB means that you don’t just take cops word for things, because they are bastards. They lie and cheat and kill with impunity. If the cop has dashcam or badge cam video of the loud “muffler,” then ticket away.

          Sure doesn’t seem the cop has proof, especially when they go fishing for more offenses after the stop. The latter is common cop behavior when they can’t pin their initial issue on you. They try to retroactively justify their bullshit, to get you for something to prove you’re the “bad guy.”

          Since the cop cant prove the noise violation, he finds several other “provable” violations like window tint or an air freshener or whatever. This adds weight to his initial, unprovable allegation, but that doesn’t actually make it true. Cops fervently hunting for penny ante “gotchas” after the fact makes the whole thing suspect.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            That is an unfortunate point. Historically the cop could prove loud noicpse because you had to modify your exhaust system, but this is just a speaker that could be on or off, with no clear proof.

            I still say that DA should be pursuing action against the manufacturer that such a feature exists

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I thought it was “innocent until PROVEN guilty”. Cop has to prove the setting was off, or that the noise was real. Putting the onus on the defendant means guilty until proven innocent.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Your reasonable doubt is that whoever is testifying it was on is committing perjury against a stranger for laughs vs the guy who actually bought a car with a noisemaker. I frankly don’t care if the depondent is a cop or some 7/11 cashier, that sort of he said she said with circumstantial evidence of possession of an actual noisemaker is the proof.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it would help if the American police would hire more on a “high IQ” base instead of “can shoot”.