WTF? Hers a better jdea, ban on steeet parking. Prove you have somewhere to park the car or not be allowed to buy it.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ban privately owned cars within medium to high density populated areas, improve public transport, expand railway to serve at least 90% of the population, remove street parking, and you won’t have to deal with this stupidity anymore.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Don’t ban cars. Slowly start removing lanes and lower all speed limits to 30 kph until there’s just one left for emergency vehicles. Remove surface lots - underground parking is much more expensive. Improve public transportation. Impose congestion fees as % of net worth.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re just describing the steps to a car ban 🤔 You might not officially call it a “ban”, but removing any incentive to have a car achieves the same result. It’s just a carrot approach vs a stick.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It would make a big difference in the US, where nudging people to make a choice is better than telling them flat out they can’t do something.

          Also, I’m pro car for fun but not for daily use so… I don’t want an outright ban

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Are you crazy!? Of course they need guns! Every large truck and SUV should have a large turret and big big ammo for when we have to fight the Russians.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is the only sensible option.

      If you need a large truck, then you should have commercial or industrial property to park it at.

      They don’t belong in residential areas unless they are there for work by a trade person or delivery service.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I believe in Japan, or Tokyo at least you have to prove you have a parking space to purchase a vehicle. This encourages the purchase of smaller vehicles or no vehicles. I guess that’s how the smart people get to 40 million without dieing from smog. Adelaide is a country town sprawled over a vast area. When I was younger I used to like living in he inner burbs but the sprawling outer burbs are a depressing wasteland. You are better probably off living in country SA if you can find work.

    Adelaide is a very inefficient and boring low density city designed to serve the interests of low-effort residential property developers which is surrounded by huge housing developments served by islands of franchised box stores. The people there don’t want to change. They like the supermarkets shutting at 5pm on a weekend and would rather pay 4 times the price to buy essentials from a wage thieving petrol station. Let them have their big cars. You don’t need to live there. People have been leaving for decades and will continue to do so. It is a shame as the place had a lot of potential.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah if you don’t have somewhere to park something you shouldn’t buy it, it’s like someone living in an apartment buying an RV then parking it on the street because they have nowhere else.

  • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    South Australian, and typically not anti-car, person here. What the actual fuck. I’m so sick of these giant yank tanks getting around and now we’re trying to be more accommodating to these rolling cod pieces?

    If the cost and availability of parking in the city is impacted by these idiots they should bear the costs with increased on-road fees for large vehicles which will hopefully discourage purchase of impractical vehicles.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, I know what you’re thinking, it’s in the middle of the alps and everything but the Swiss have great trains

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is a bit hard to parse, but it’s worth noting that Switzerland does have great trains. Often described as the best national network in the world. In this incredibly mountainous country, where almost every line involves multiple tunnels and bridges and viaducts, you can get to all but the smallest of towns by train.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    One problem we’ll need to solve is temperature. Today at 16:00 on my way home the road was 51°C. I know this because that’s the temperature my car thermometer measured.

    I want to use public transport, but until we figure out how to walk to the bus stop and wait for the bus without dying it’s not going to happen.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, that’s not going to happen. I’m already in a “habitable” area, Perth in Western Australia. Unless everyone moves to the Arctic, we need to solve the problem in another way.