• Sips'@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sadly “Gmail” is what a lot of people know mail as. They’re not even aware anything other than Gmail and outlook exists. I at least always have friends and family looking at me weird every time I tell them my mail is the name of my custom domain, some even think I’m joking with em 😅

      It’s a sad reality.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mozilla needs to fix their poor image before trying email.

    Frankly, after the last few years I don’t trust them with a browser, let alone email.

    Not happening. I already pay for an email service that has been privacy centric from the start, and has none of the bad news Mozilla does.

    Mozilla has flat out lied to us about changes in Firefox with “No, you just misunderstood what we’re doing” . Why should anyone trust them with email?

    Pound sand Mozilla.

  • Lucy :3@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anything not selfhosted and/or decentralized, including VPNs, is, by design, not 100% privacy-first.

  • Otter@lemmy.caM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thundermail – not to be confused with Mozilla’s decades-old Thunderbird email client – will be an email service similar to Gmail that can be used within Thunderbird and on the web. With Thundermail, you can use either a Thundermail email address or a custom domain. Also, this new 100% open-source email service will never use your email to train AI, flood your inbox with ads, or collect and sell your data. (So maybe it’s not that similar to Gmail.) That’s a big win for those who are concerned about privacy.

    Huh interesting, Mozilla and Proton are having more and more overlap. More choice is a good thing?

    • Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      at the beginning, we plan to offer these services for free to consistent community contributors. Other users will have to pay for access.

      Where does it say it’s free?

  • kwr112233@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    I KNOW privacy is important. But switching something you already use out needs to be exciting.

    To be honest, switching for privacy feels like a chore.

      • kwr112233@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Whoah there, buddy. Easy on the misinterpretations.

        My point is that taking action is most likely to occur when there is a strong, present motivation. Not just for email provider choices, for everything.

        • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fair enough. I would argue that the word choice and phrasing of your first comment isn’t in line with the one you just made, but definitely fair enough.

          I would say that if improved privacy isn’t motivation enough in and of itself, then the people lacking that motivation wouldn’t care even if there were some added incentives until they got into the absurd range of basically buying customers. The folks that don’t care about privacy enough for an improvement at this scale just won’t care about any improvement to their privacy at all.