• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, you can easily bypass passkeys with automation. Don’t even need an image recognition model, just a QR-code scanner like zbarimg.

    But i never tried googles passkey feature since it never seemed as secure as a 48 char computer generated password. So I’m not sure exactly how it works.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a pretty wild claim. It almost sounds like you don’t know what a passkey is. Explain.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Oh I don’t know what it is, sorry I thought I made that clear. But a quick search on the internet said it was basically 2fa with a qr code and since the issue was how it would protect Lemmy from bots I just thought it wouldn’t be hard for a bot to read a qr code.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Bruh that’s gotta be one of the worst trains of thought I’ve seen recently ngl. I don’t even know how passkeys work and I know that. Based on your understanding, you could log into someone’s account just by reading a QR code. Which of these is more likely:

          • The entire cybersecurity community mysteriously and completely forgot that machines can read QR codes (which is, by the way, literally the entire purpose of a QR code)

          • You don’t understand how passkeys work

          How arrogant do you have to be?

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Well again, the claim was that somehow passkeys would stop Lemmy from being flooded by bots.

            So in that situation, we aren’t talking about hacking. We are simply talking about if a login could be triggered programmatically. So if Lemmy required passkeys to be used instead of passwords. And if the passkeys required scanning a QR code to sign in. I imagine It would provide minimal disruption to an automated login.

            Now if the passkeys somehow enforced a real human to do something that only a human could do, then yes it would stop an automated registration/login. However if it’s possible to automate then it wouldn’t stop bots.