"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agoControversial questionlemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up11.7Karrow-down116cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.68Karrow-down1external-linkControversial questionlemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square107fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoI would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoCool definition. Still not a majority.
I would argue voting for a candidate you know will lose with certainty is not a vote for or against anything.
Cool definition. Still not a majority.