Can’t grow your wealth exponentially if stocks always go up, now can you?

Not yet, but we should implement the rules while people can still tell it apart

And by implication pointed out the difficulty in finding one. Unless you literally made a statement about just the types of images they chose with no further intellectual depth, which I mean is possible (I do that shit all the time), it comes with the assumed next statement about there not being violent atheists, or at least there are less violent atheists. So I was talking to that point.

That being said, I’m autistic so I might just missing the point, but I figured that my statement should still be made in case others thought like I did initially. There have been atrocities committed by atheists and there are violent atheists.

CCP and USSR stamped out religious practice, but go off.

As an Atheist myself, don’t delude yourself into thinking religion is unique in its capacity for horrors. Humans have that capacity, any group we make would also have that capacity.

This, by the way, is why I hate AI. My first thought was “fucking AI post”. I hate that I can’t trust the things I see.

Label AI shit. Thanks!

Yeah, exactly. This argument about YouTube isn’t relevant to Nebula.

I don’t disagree, but I don’t see how you can do that. Well, I kind of do, that’s by “taking the word back”, poisoning the meaning of the word or its association so that hateful people won’t want to be associated with it. I know it’s definitely not shaming people for calling out that it’s a dog whistle. Because, again, that puts the moral failing on the person calling it out rather than the people who gave it the negative association to begin with.

That quickly becomes “ugh, these fucking SJWs policing everyone’s speech” instead of “ugh, these fucking losers ruining perfectly good words with their hatred”, which it should be.

Never assumed this person was a bigot. The point being made is that “female” is now a dog whistle word for the alt-right. Dog whistles by themselves aren’t proof that someone is a bigot, but they are still words associated with bigotry.

You can’t control what words become dog-whistles (Jean-Paul Sartre quote “But they(anti-semites) are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words”) but you can acknowledge that they ARE dog whistles without it being some moral failing to point it out.

Who said anything about getting them to change? Getting mad at people because the word changed instead of getting mad at the people who changed the word is my point. There’s a reason why that word was targeted as a dog whistle, but it is still a dog whistle now and acknowledging that it is isn’t some moral wrong.

“Hey, bigots say this and it makes people sound like bigots when they say it”

“I used that word correctly and was told that it made me sound like a bigot. Maybe think about that?”

Cool, maybe get mad at the bigots who ruined the word for people rather than the people saying the word was ruined by bigots.

It’s like when people get mad at the r-slur being a slur now. Like, no, it was always intended as an insult based on medical language. It was always going to become a slur.

Now people are using the word female to both alienate and other women in their language and to “sound smarter” when showing bigotry. Also, you were probably told to not say it because they knew you were better than the assholes who say it in a demeaning way. Maybe… think about that?

deleted by creator

All of them were innocent, since none had trials

Car infrastructure was a mistake. Automation isn’t the solution, it’s less cars and car-based spaces.

…I am a dumb. Very good. Thanks for the info!

Denethor wouldn’t be in that chat. You don’t need to be allied directly with someone to help serve their purposes. You just have to be some amount of incompetent/ afraid. Which is the entire point of Denethor (and Elaida in WOT)

There’s no more info than that. Sorry for the tautology, but that’s all the fucking info that exists. Revelation is an acid trip transcribed a few thousand times. What isn’t hamfisted symbolism is just “this thing is this thing” with no further explanation.

It’s a mark that shows you’re a follower of the beast.

They way I explain it is this. Trump’s first presidency, the dog caught the car. No one expected, least of all the dog. They had no plan, no idea what to do with what they had.

This time around, they were ready for the impossible, ready to break as much shit as possible, and they have the knowledge of what happened in the first term to give them context on what worked and what didn’t.

It’s a shoop