• comfydecal@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe not be sexist by comparing asses to blow up sex dolls? You don’t make many friends by shitting on your friends to shit on your enemies, yeah?

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Can you explain what makes it sexist? /gen From my POV, this post is comparing two MAGAts visually to a sex doll. Would it be sexist if it was a guy blow up doll and two guy MAGAts? I can understand it being rude, because you’re making fun of appearances, but the post is not saying “all women MAGAts are sex dolls”, it’s saying these two specific look like them. Once again, I’m asking genuinely. I’m not neurotypical, I dont understand these things like others do.

      • Awkwardly_Frank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        It implies that these women are objects undeserving of or without agency of their own. Doing so on the basis of appearance is as good as doing so on the basis of sex or gender. There’s no broader point being made here beyond “I don’t like them so I’m comparing them to a taboo sex object.”

        That’s said they’re also abysmal human beings.