• htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    A small critique of that project - a large portion of the websites included are simply personal sites for developers - nothing barely more technical than a business card or CV. I would exclude those or categorize them differently, as to me their “usefulness” seems relatively edge case.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I clicked on 6 sites

      • 4 were personal portfolio sites

      • 1 was a personal blog

      • 1 was a web design company

      Pretty disappointing, and I’m not going to keep clicking on more in the hopes I find something interesting

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They are useful for those people though. You can put a QR code or URL on your business card and it will give people all the information they need for your businessor something.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I don’t think anyone is arguing that having, like, websites are useful. But if they’re not particularly interesting then it doesn’t really fit here.

        The point of something like this is generally to come up with interesting/creative/useful things within arbitrary resource limits. Not just a bunch of really really limited boring stuff.