• LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Do you think this wouldn’t happen if Kamala was president? Because I seem to recall an entire genocide they could have halted a year ago but chose not to.

      Are you seriously arguing that slow genocide is better than quick genocide?

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’m arguing that you can have protests and at least an effect with Kamala and the dems in power…good luck with repubs and trump. They are don’t give two fucks about anyone.

    • return2ozma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know neolibs like to blame everyone and everything but themselves but even if 100% of the protest voters voted for Harris, she still would have lost.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If every protest voter and third party voter was for Harris, she would have still lost in the landslide.

        Turns out having horrid policies, saying “I’m not going to change from the person in office no one currently likes, except emulate Trump more”, doesn’t work. Who knew you had to be popular in a national popularity contest?