This does unfortunately happen multiple times per day. Sometimes it’s smaller incidents where the tram driver can get out and collapse the car’s mirror. Other times the owner of the car comes out of a nearby house after the tram used its bell extensively (like today) and moves the car. And then there are times when police needs to get involved to tow the car which often takes upwards of 1 hour.

The truly infuriating part is that if the tram damages a poorly parked car, the transportation company will have to pay the damages. Poorly parked vehicles never get fined and the owners will only need to pay if the car ends up getting towed.

Why do we accept that drivers sabotage a city’s public transport infrastructure like this?

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I’d say the road isn’t wide enough. While the vehicle is parked away from the curb, it’s not egregious, and shouldn’t be in the way of a tram line if the road was planned properly. The fact there isn’t enough room for the tram to pass means there isn’t really enough room between parked vehicles and the drive lanes in the first place.

    That picture screams to me that the tram line was added after the fact without proper planning and road management.

    • Pechente@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 days ago

      The car was parked poorly. The parking spots can even accommodate construction vans. Here’s an angle where you can see it a bit better.

      The car is parked almost half a meter away from the curb (at least at the back wheel).

      I do agree that it’s a planning issue though. There is no reason that this street needs free parking spots and if they REALLY need to be there, there should be a better indication if your car is sticking out too much.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        It would be so simple to paint a line on the road! I don’t see one. Get out of the car, look down, re-park if necessary. And it would make ticketing easier too. Ticket if any part of the car touches or goes into the line, looking straight down. And if the other edge of the line is the max of the tram, you have the width of the line-paint as your buffer zone.

        • Pechente@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 days ago

          They’re trying to do that right now with blue dots but for some reason this is not road legal and needs to go through some unnecessary paperwork before it can be approved

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 days ago

            Whaddya mean dots? Raised bumpies? I still think a solid painted line would do the job and there’d be no room for argument about whether the vehicle was in violation. I’m all for raised dots along the line, so you’d feel if your tires were over it, help you position. But you also want the fenders and mirrors inside the lines.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Usually because otherwise there wouldn’t be much space left for parking at all.

        In some places, these trams are gonna run through every major route, leaving no room for parking on smaller streets, and barely any parking that isn’t next to tram rails on larger streets.

        If you want to have both trams and cars, then depending on the city, you might have no choice but to put parking spots there given the size of the inner-city roads.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s possible, but knowing modern city management, it’s very likely the tram was the newest addition as people requested public transit alternatives and the city failed to properly plan it out.

        There’s not enough room with the way the road is setup for parking, traffic, and the tram. It doesn’t really matter which was there first. Either the roadway needs to be widened to accommodate all of them, or the street parking should be removed. Especially if parked vehicles are regularly getting in the way.

        One car in the way is a fluke, an asshole driver, but cars being in the way regularly means the design is fucked.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Knowing modern city management, adding parking spaces is always more likely than adding public transit. I’m sure they already had a tram network but local shops wanted some street-side parking to increase business, so they just crammed it in there.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            It was the opposite in my city. Street parking has always been there, but the light rail was retrofitted into the tiny streets all over downtown in the last 5 years.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Yeah I’ve never seen them increase public transport in my entire life. I guess it depends on the city/country.

              Either way, they shouldn’t widen the streets. They should just get rid of the parking.