Briahna Joy Gray | @briebriejoy

“We should all agree the answer is not to defund the police, its to fund them. Fund them. Fund them.” - Joe Biden

As Kamala Harris blames everyone but herself for Donald Trump’s authoritarianism, the Democrats ignore the extent they’ve actively persuaded their base to move to the right on issue likes BLM & fracking – not to mention funding ICE. “This is your resistance party?”

https://youtu.be/1_YEuk_Ohs8 [1]

[Video: https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1977730662133014528/vid/avc1/1920x1080/DxAXW_8wOTdHmSNk.mp4]

6:46 AM | Oct 13, 2025

Source: https://x.com/briebriejoy/status/1977732615013540255/


  1. [1] One Battle After Another - A Misogynoir-Filled Anti-Left Psyop? (w/ Van Lathan Jr.) [01:23:57 | OCT 09 2025 | Bad Faith | https://youtu.be/1_YEuk_Ohs8] ↩︎

  • keyez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Pushing anyone in primaries yes. Apparently was a rule set by all the new members. Seems progressive candidates are still being supported to me. I see plenty running.

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The issue was that previously, DNC officers/etc. pushed preferred candidates behind closed doors - that’s what the public had problems with and that’s why people resigned. The rule you are referring to was proposed by Ken Martin after David Hogg announced Leaders We Deserve and his intentions to push progressive primary challengers.

      Seems like progressives are still getting ratfucked, as usual. David Hogg would’ve been more powerful internally in the DNC, and honestly, after the DNC ratfucked Bernie, progressives should have been allowed to gain a foothold internally and do whatever they want (within reason) to openly support other progressives, at least for a certain grace period.

      It’s naive to expect that DNC officers will be truly neutral under this rule. This rule just served to block David Hogg.