All the same privacy harms with online tracking are also present with AI, but worse.

  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    What do yall mean “before it’s too late”, it is too late to stop from happening, we have to start planning on how to destroy it

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    While I don’t like tracking and mass surveillance it is important to realize that the tech to do so has been around for 25 years.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    all the privacy debates surrounding Google search results from the past two decades apply one-for-one to AI chats, but to an even greater degree. That’s why we (at DuckDuckGo) started offering Duck.ai for protected chatbot conversations and optional, anonymous AI-assisted answers in our private search engine. In doing so, we’re demonstrating that privacy-respecting AI services are feasible.

    I like and use DuckDuckGo but I don’t see how they can guarantee this, similar to how a VPN might claim to keep no logs but you can’t really know for sure.

    I think it would be cool if there was software that downloads local copies of wikipedia, stackoverflow etc., and you can ask questions that will be responded to with relevant informative pages without that query going to a server.