• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Self hosting for your own needs is great but you won’t get the “drive by” contributions you get from shared platforms. On GitHub, Gitlab, and Codeberg, if I even see as little as a typo in the readme file, I open a pull request. I will not sign up on a hundred different git hosters for stuff like that.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I remember Sourceforge, bitbucket, and a host of other “source” servers. GitHub was nice for a while, but its just another iteration of the same. Heck a lot of the major repos (like Linux for example) only do mirrors to GitHub. The same with codeberg, Gitlab, and other centralized services.

      At my last few jobs, we couldn’t host on GitHub because of HIPPAA compliance. It was fine. Self hosting git is VERY common in quite a few industries.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      On GitHub, Gitlab, and Codeberg, if I even see as little as a typo in the readme file, I open a pull request. I will not sign up on a hundred different git hosters for stuff like that.

      So we need a free & federated identity provider to sign us up as easy as 123 there.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      i am still rooting for patch requests to become more mainstream, it seems like the best possible solution. it just needs some discoverability.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Adding Oauth with GitHub and GitLab is pretty easy

        OAuth is just making yet another account with a 3rd party authorization mechanism.